The worst emperor Rome had was Commodus. Caligula was said to have gone mad and have become cruel, but modern historians have cast doubts on this. Many of the bad stories told about Nero were slander by his political opponents. Nero was hated by the aristocracy, but loved by the poor who were very upset when he died.
There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.There were no emperors before Christ. Jesus was born during the reign of Augustus, the first emperor.
The Claudian emperors were two of the first five Roman emperors, or perhaps I should say one and a half of the first five Roman emperors. The first five emperors are referred to as the Julio-Claudian dynasty. This was because Augustus had no male heir and so adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. He was the "one" Claudian emperor. He was followed by Caligula, who was a Julian, and he, in turn was followed by Claudius who was a Claudian on his father's side and a Julian on his mother's side. So Claudius was half Claudian and half Julian. Nero, a Julian, rounded out the dynasty.
Emperor Diocletian, who created a tetrarchy to more effectively govern the Roman world. It consisted of two senior emperors (augustii) and two junior emperors (caesars), with the western capital based in Rome and the eastern capital in what would be Constantinople.
they had rulers called emperors or empires that ruled each city but the emperors ruler was the gods.
From Augustus (the first emperor) to the division of the Empire into Eastern and Western Empires in A.D. 395 there were 147 Roman Emperors, including 7 ruling the rebel Gallic empire and 2 leading the rebel British empire in defiance of central authority. After A.D.395 the Western Empire lasted until A.D476 under 23 emperors. The Eastern Empire lasted from A.D.395 to A.D.1453 under 94 emperors. From this you can see that the number of Roman emperors will be 147 if you count only the rulers of the United Roman Empire, or 9 fewer excluding rebel emperors, and many more if the Divided Empire totals of 23 and 94 more emperors are included.
Ever time they were emperors, something bad happend.(ex. war)
Nero and Vespasian
There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.
The two greatest emperors of India were Asoka and Akbar.
Yes.
augutus
The bad emperors
The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.
The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.
The first emperor that wasted money in the roman empire was Marcus Aurelius because the economy was bad by the inflation of prices.
There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.There were actually two emperors in the year 284. One was Carinus, and the other was Diocletian who overthrew him.
The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.The two emperors immediately following Augustus were Tiberius and Caligula. They both could be called leaders as they were heads of state.