answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

a) The senate did not want him to have too much power

b) He thought that dividing the empire would make it easier to rule

c) He wanted to give the Christian minority a region of their own

d) Laws for one part of the empire did not work well in the other part

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
  • The Jewish diaspora refers to what.

Beginning with Diocletian in the late 3rd century CE (or, AD), the Roman Empire was divided into distinct parts, each ruled by a distinct "master" or co-emperor. This division was made for the sake of greater efficiency of rule as well as to serve as an additional hedge against the civil strife that had plagued Rome in prior decades, with various leaders vying for absolute power and the Empire suffering from instability at its highest level.
The Roman Empire was too large to run or protect from invaders effectively. By sharing control with a second capital and Emperor provided a way to maintain the empire.

(Freeman, 2004)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Theodosius never divided the Roman Empire, instead it was Diocletian because it was to big and he was losing control over it, so he thought that by making it smaller he wouldn't loose power in some parts of the Empire.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Constantine did not split the empire. All he did was move the capitol.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the emperor's purpose for dividing the Roman Empire?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Ancient History

How many emperors did the roman empire have?

From Augustus (the first emperor) to the division of the Empire into Eastern and Western Empires in A.D. 395 there were 147 Roman Emperors, including 7 ruling the rebel Gallic empire and 2 leading the rebel British empire in defiance of central authority. After A.D.395 the Western Empire lasted until A.D476 under 23 emperors. The Eastern Empire lasted from A.D.395 to A.D.1453 under 94 emperors. From this you can see that the number of Roman emperors will be 147 if you count only the rulers of the United Roman Empire, or 9 fewer excluding rebel emperors, and many more if the Divided Empire totals of 23 and 94 more emperors are included.


When did Constantine reunite the roman empire?

Constantine did not reunite the Roman Empire. The Roman empire was never split. Emperor Diocletian had created the tetrarchy (role by four) in 286. This was a system of co-emperorship with four co-emperors. Two of them were senior emperors (Augusti) in charge of the eastern part of the empire (Diocletian) and the western part of the empire (Maximian). The other two were junior emperors subordinated to the senior ones and in charge of the defence of the troubled frontier areas of the river Rhine in the west and the river Danube in the east. These were administrative and defence reform of a a single empire. The terms Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire have been coined by historians. The Romans had only one term Roman Empire. Diocletian stressed that the Roman Empire was indivisible. Constantine started as a co-emperor and became sole emperor in 324 after wining two civil wars, one against a usurper (Maxentius) an one against co-emperor Licinius.


What effect did Diocletian had on roman history?

The Emperor Diocletian was the one who created the Tetrarchy. The Tetrarchy was the division of the Roman Empire into four parts, with a co-emperors ruling over each quarter. Diocletian also oversaw the last period of persecution against Christians in the Roman Empire.


Which Roman Emperor divided the Roman empire into east and west?

Emperor Diocletian, who created a tetrarchy to more effectively govern the Roman world. It consisted of two senior emperors (augustii) and two junior emperors (caesars), with the western capital based in Rome and the eastern capital in what would be Constantinople.


How many Roman emperors were there?

All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.

Related questions

Who was the first of 65 emperors to rule the roman empire?

The first Roman emperor was Augustus. However, there were more than 65 Roman emperors. Up to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire there were 91 emperors. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years after the fall of the western part and there were further 81 emperors. There were also 7 emperors of a short-lived breakaway part of the empire which historians have called the "Gallic Empire."


Who was the first of the 65 emperors to the Roman empire?

The first Roman emperor was Augustus. However, there were more than 65 Roman emperors. Up to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire there were 91 emperors. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years after the fall of the western part and there were further 81 emperors. There were also 7 emperors of a short-lived breakaway part of the empire which historians have called the "Gallic Empire."


What was the emperor's purpose in dividing the empire between east and west?

The Roman Empire was not actually divided. East and West were administrative subdivisions usually headed by two co-emperors (one in the east and one in the west) through sometimes the empire was ruled by a sole emperor. The purpose was to share the defence of the vast frontiers of the empire which were often attacked by outsiders at very distant locations. This had at times caused the Roman army to become overstretched.


What did Roman emperors do?

Rule the Roman empire with the assistance of the Senate.


How many emperors did the roman empire have?

From Augustus (the first emperor) to the division of the Empire into Eastern and Western Empires in A.D. 395 there were 147 Roman Emperors, including 7 ruling the rebel Gallic empire and 2 leading the rebel British empire in defiance of central authority. After A.D.395 the Western Empire lasted until A.D476 under 23 emperors. The Eastern Empire lasted from A.D.395 to A.D.1453 under 94 emperors. From this you can see that the number of Roman emperors will be 147 if you count only the rulers of the United Roman Empire, or 9 fewer excluding rebel emperors, and many more if the Divided Empire totals of 23 and 94 more emperors are included.


Why was Roman Emperor so significant?

There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.


Who ran the holy empire?

The Holy Roman Emperors were the heads of this empire.


Who were the Empores of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire?

The emperors of the Roman empire (the so-called Eastern and Western parts) were the men who ruled. For the names of specific emperors and the times that they ruled, type "Roman emperors" into your browser and you will come up with several websites that will give you lists of their names.


Who was the first of the 65 emperor to rule the roman empire?

The first Roman emperor was Augustus. However, there were more than 65 Roman emperors. Up to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire there were 91 emperors. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years after the fall of the western part and there were further 81 emperors. There were also 7 emperors of a short-lived breakaway part of the empire which historians have called the "Gallic Empire."


Did the roman emperors have political power?

The Roman emperors were the absolute rulers of the Roman Empire. Power wasconcentratedin their hands and they empowered to make all the decisions.


What two emperors tried to restore the roman empire?

The two emperors who tried to restore order in the Roman Empire were Diocletian and Constantine I (or the Great).


Who made the roman empire Survive?

How did changing ideas about what made up the Roman community help the Roman Empire survive