clothes
poor Victorian children would wear rags and if they were lucky a dress made of cotton to keep them warm
Yes, the poor people would work for or be slaves for the rich, the poor people were the plebeians and the rich were called the patricians; the equestrians was another of the classes.
In the old kingdom there was little difference between the clothes worn by the rich and the poor. Men of all classes wore a short kilt made of linen and women wore a long skirt with straps at the shoulders. Rich men and women wore wigs and jewelry while the poor did not. As time went on the clothes of rich people got more elabourate including wearing of silk, while the clothes of the poor remained very much the same.
you
the rich would go out for dances and party in their rich clothes and drinking wine or beer .^ .^ :)
they wore different clothes
the rich people wore clothes
girls and boys wear identical clothes
posh clothes
there are 200 because they have counted them
Because in medieval times the clothes were colored with natural dye... the purple color came from a very rare flower, so only the rich people could have it. The thing is in those times the rich people were only royalty.
contrary to popular belief, they didn't wear clothes.
yes. they are different because rich people have more money then poor people there for they get to buy more expensive Pisces of clothing. while poor people buy cheep Pisces or clothing
Almost the same as people today, but with different hairstyles. Also their clothes were different. Rich people wore jewellled clothes made out of rich materials, while poor people werent allowed to wear such clothes, so they wore rags, and usually lived on the streets.
All the best dressed people get there clothes from Netto, you should to.
Children wore mini versions of adults and boys wore girl's clothes until they were 9. They wore heavy satins and ruffed necks.