Tags US Constitution US Government US Supreme Court

Animals & Plants Arts & Entertainment Auto Beauty & Health Books and Literature Business Electronics Engineering & Technology Food & Drink History Hobbies Jobs & Education Law & Government Math People & Society Science Social Studies Sports Travel & Places

0

Subjects>History>American Government

Why would a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?

Anonymous

∙ 14y ago

Updated: 4/28/2022

A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).

Wiki User

∙ 14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

Lao

The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.

Chat with Lao

Ezra

Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.

Chat with Ezra

Vivi

Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.

Chat with Vivi

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts

Q: Why would a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

imp

Continue Learning about American Government

What kind of US Supreme Court decision indicates more members of the majority signed a concurring opinion than the official opinion of the Court?

If more justices agree with a concurring opinion than with the opinion of the Court, the decision is called a plurality.

What is the explanation given by justices who do not agree with the decision of the majority?

No. If a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision and wants to make his or her opinion a matter of public and judicial record, the justice must write a dissenting opinion.For more information, see Related Questions, below.

A justice who agrees with the results reached by the majority of the court but wants to voice disapproval of the grounds on which decsion was made would write a what?

a concurring opinion

Which supreme court justice said of the obscenity you know it when you see it?

Potter Stewart, in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184 (1964).For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Who is the highest judge of the US Supreme Court?

The Chief Justice presides over the US Supreme Court. At present, the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court is John G. Roberts, Jr.

Trending Questions

Who started the red scare? The balance of power among the three branches of government is referred to as a system of blalances and what? How does democracy in a enhance the dignity of individuals? What is the title given to the head of the executive branch of the U S government? What is regulatory affairs in pharma? Why was 1787 important? What kind of government is every state in the union guaranteed? Which of the following pre-World War 2 situations is most similar to this scenario? What are the impeachment powers for the house of representatives? Who governs the DMZ? Which statement accurately compares developments in Judaism and Christianity? When did the American welfare state begin? Is the House of Representatives based on population? How do you convene a constitutional convention? What are powers not specifically given to the federal government by the US Constitution? How many times has the US Constitution been amended Verb? Where did the Continental Army scored its first and much needed victory at? Summarize the political and cultural conflict between city and pampas in Argentina? Which of these statements can be inferred form the information on the table covering the period from 1953 to 1960? What are all citizens guaranteed when visiting other states?

Related Questions

What does a US Supreme Court justice write when agreeing with the majority?

A concurring opinion

An opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with a case but does not agree with its legal logic is called a?

concurring opinion

What does a justice write if he agrees with the opinion of the Court but not its reasoning?

The opinion is typically labeled "Concurring in Judgment."

What kind of US Supreme Court decision indicates more members of the majority signed a concurring opinion than the official opinion of the Court?

If more justices agree with a concurring opinion than with the opinion of the Court, the decision is called a plurality.

What is a concurring opinion?

In US Supreme Court decisions, a concurring opinion is an opinion by one or more justices which agrees with the result the majority opinion reached but either for additional or other legal reasons which the majority opinion rests on. The writer of a concurring opinion is counted within the majority of justices who agreed on the ultimate result of the case, but disagrees in some way with the legal reasoning of the other justices. The concurring opinion sets forth that justice's own reasoning. In law, a concurring opinion is a written opinion by some of the judges of a court which agrees with the majority of the court but might arrive there in a different manner. In a concurring opinion, the author agrees with the decision of the court but normally states reasons different from those in the court opinion as the basis for his or her decision. When no absolute majority of the court can agree on the basis for deciding the case, the decision of the court may be contained in a number of concurring opinions, and the concurring opinion joined by the greatest number of jurists is referred to as the plurality opinion.In law, a concurring opinion is a written opinion by some of the judges of a court which agrees with the majority of the court but might arrive there in a different manner. In a concurring opinion, the author agrees with the decision of the court but normally states reasons different from those in the court opinion as the basis for his or her decision. When no absolute majority of the court can agree on the basis for deciding the case, the decision of the court may be contained in a number of concurring opinions, and the concurring opinion joined by the greatest number of jurists is referred to as the plurality opinion.

What is the name given to a written decision by Supreme Court Justices that while they agree with the final outcome of the case they do not agree with the reasoning behind the final outcome?

It is a concurring opinion. If there is no disagreement with the basis, the justice is included in the "majority opinion." In some cases, concurring opinions can become plurality decisions.

. What does it mean when a Supreme Court justice issues a dissenting opinion?

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.

What does mean when a supreme court justice issues a dissenting opinion?

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.

One a Supreme Court Justice disagrees with the majority opinion of the court what is he or she doing?

A US Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority opinion writes a dissenting opinion, explaining why he or she disagrees with the majority.

When the supreme court rules on a case how many opinions might be written to explain the verdict?

There is no mandated limit; however, the practical limit would be nine -- one for each member of the Court. Only one opinion may be submitted as the official opinion of the Court; however, each justice is free to write a dissenting or concurring (or dissenting in part and concurring in part) opinion as part of the legal record. While concurring and dissenting opinions are unenforceable, they may be cited as precedent in future cases and sometimes become more influential than the original opinion of the Court.

What do the nine US Supreme Court justices deliver after they hear a case?

Opinions. The "Opinion of the Court" is the official, majority decision or verdict. Each justice may write his or her own opinion, most of which are either concurring or dissenting, although there are other types used less often. Any justice that agrees with the written opinion of another justice may sign, or "join" the author in his or her argument.For more information on US Supreme Court opinions, see Related Links, below.

What is the explanation given by justices who do not agree with the decision of the majority?

No. If a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision and wants to make his or her opinion a matter of public and judicial record, the justice must write a dissenting opinion.For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Still have questions?

imp

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company

Copyright ©2025 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.