0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did rights granted by magna Carta different from rights based on natural law?
The idea of natural right comes several hundred years after the Magna Carta. Natural Rights is a revolutionary idea in the time of kings. Basically it states that God has given people rights and that the king is not the only person with rights.
Was their any ladies who signed the Bill of Rights?
no probly not <><><> No one signed the Bill of Rights. It is part of the US Constitution. The Consitution was ratified by states, not signed. If you mean the Declaration of Independence, no- women were not voters or politicians at that time.
Why did the founding father include the bill of rights with the constitution?
Once the delegates at the Constitutional Convention agreed on the need to compose a Constitution, problems began to arise. Northern and Southern states disagreed about the nature and presence of slavery. Larger states with more population and smaller states with smaller populations disagreed about the nature of representation. The largest issue which caused the greatest amount of inertia concerned about the role of federal government in the life of its citizens. Federalists wanted a strong national government so that a sense of law and order and basic functionality can be present in the new nation. Arising out of the terrible reality of Shays' Rebellion as well as the high level of futility featured within the first Constitution called the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists, such as John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, were fairly pronounced on the issue of a strong federal governmental body. At the same time, the antifederalists, consisting of individuals like Patrick Henry and George Mason, felt that emboldening the federal government without some measure of individual freedom to act as a check against the authority would be a repeat of the tyranny featured with King George of Britain. The Bill of Rights was the compromise that pleased both sides. Federalists were happy because the federal government would retain its power to govern the nation effectively and properly. The Antifederalists were happy because the Bill of Rights became the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, and demanded that while federal government possessed power, it did not come at the cost of individual rights.
What did john c breckinridge believe in?
John C. Breckinridge believed in states' rights and the preservation of slavery. He was a strong advocate for the rights of Southern states to determine their own laws and policies, including the institution of slavery. He served as vice president of the United States under President James Buchanan and later became a leader of the Confederate States of America during the American Civil War.
When and to what extent is it acceptable for the government to place the needs of the nation over the rights of the individual?
In cases where there is a breach in national security, it is acceptable for the government to place the needs of a nation over the rights of an individual. The government is trying to protect the national security of the United States all the time.
Is states rights an issue in government today why or why not?
I believe that it is still an issue because even though Jackson and Clay had managed to keep the Union together by the Compromise of 1833 ( a compromise that lowered tariff duties gradually), the question of states' rights remained unsettled up to this time.
What are the two problems that led to the civil war?
There are two main issue of the time and those were "State Rights" and "the moral issue of Slavery"... but they are pretty much interconnected because states believed they had a right to make its own laws dealing with slavery and the federal government had no rights in dealing with this issue within the state.
How could you use states rights in a sentence?
The government wanted to evoke states' rights before the civil war. States' rights were highly controversial during that time period. States' rights is a plural noun.
Who is entitled to subscribe to a Rights Issue?
Those who held shares at the time of book closure.
What is the time gap between two rights issue?
The time gap between two rights issues can vary significantly depending on the company's needs and market conditions. Typically, companies may wait at least 6 months to 1 year before launching another rights issue to give shareholders time to assess the previous offering and the company's performance.
What created the Civil War?
The industrial north and the less populated agrarian south fought over states's rights issues, tariffs, and lopsided northern representation in Congress. Slavery was a very minor issue at the time.
Why was the bill of rights passed at the same time?
in order for the states to ratify the u.s constitution, it needed a bill of rights.
What rights does a step mother have getting involved in school issue ans speakin to the child's teachers.?
Depends on the state. In some states, stepparents have equal rights to school information, medical information, and can even sign for medical care. In other states, if certain time limits are met, they can even sue for custody as an equal to the bio parents if there is a divorce. In other states, they can do nothing. BTW - hi!
Which political leader was most closely identified with the doctrine of states rights?
States' Rights LeaderThe leader was Vice President John C. Calhoun.
How did the nullification crisis lead to the war?
The nullification crisis lead to the civil war because the southern states felt it took away from their rights. States rights were very important at this time in history.
Why do historians insist slavery was the cause of the war?
Because that's a fairly accurate representation of the facts. It can be argued that it was actually over states rights, but it's undeniable that the principal "right" in question was the right for a state to decide for itself whether it would allow or forbid slavery. Also, the contemporary literature makes it clear that as far as the writers of the time were concerned, slavery was the real issue. It wasn't until several years afterward, when people were starting to be embarrassed about slavery, that Southerners tried to recast it as a "states' rights" philosophical issue.
Is the civil war the fight over slavery?
Modern revisionists get it wrong every time (and on purpose). The slavery issue actually had very little to do with the War Between the States. The main reasons were the same as with the Revolutionary War : State's Rights and taxation without representation.
