Kelly, They believed that parties, factions as they called them, would be bad for republican self government because people could become more loyal to their party than the country and more concerned for the party's power than the good of the common weal. Michael Montagne Per the previous comment, the founding fathers knew that factions would naturally develop. See federalist paper #10. Madison describes faction as "...a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." Madison also said, "There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests." Because neither of these are possible factions must exist. However, the way to maintain a balance of power is through a "multiplicity of faction." If they are all fighting for the same power, factions will give a little to gain a little. If the founding fathers established political parties, they would grow in power too rapidly to control and before you knew it the government would become an oligarchy - rule of the few, and/or tyrannical.
The Founding Fathers opposed political parties because they feared they would lead to political disunity and fragmentation. George Washington in his Farewell Address denounced them, calling them "baneful," etc.
They did not really expect the emergence of political parties.
Parties came into existence with the disagreement over how to interpret the Constitution. Washington's Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton, was a "loose constructionist," one who believed that the Constitution should be interpreted loosely. Thomas Jefferson, Washington's Secretary of State, and James Madison, the "Father of the Constitution," were "strict constructionists," those who believed that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written.
Followers of Hamilton came to begin calling themselves Federalists, and followers of Jefferson/Madison, Democratic-Republicans. These were the first political parties.
For more info, go to www.constitutioncenter.org and run "necessary and proper clause" in the Search section. Do the same thing in the Interactive Constitution section.
Also a review of the Federalist Papers would be worthwhile, particularly Federalist #45 and #51 (both written by Madison). They are a little hard to read, but will give you a good idea of what the Framers (and the representatives of "We the People" in the ratifying conventions) had in mind when they wrote/ratified the Constitution. See: www.yale.edu/lawweb/Avalon/federal/fed.htm.
Good luck.
They did not really expect the emergence of political parties.
Parties came into existence as a result of a significant disagreement over how to interpret the Constitution.
Washington's Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton, was a "loose constructionist," one who believed that the Constitution should be interpreted loosely. Thomas Jefferson, Washington's Secretary of State, and James Madison, the "Father of the Constitution," were "strict constructionists," those who believed that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written.
Followers of Hamilton came to begin calling themselves Federalists, and followers of Jefferson/Madison, Democratic-Republicans. These were the first political parties.
For more info, go to www.constitutioncenter.org and run "necessary and proper clause" in the Search section. Do the same thing in the Interactive Constitution section.
Also a review of the Federalist Papers would be worthwhile, particularly Federalist #45 and #51 (both written by Madison). They are a little hard to read, but will give you a good idea of what the Framers (and the representatives of "We the People" in the ratifying conventions) had in mind when they wrote/ratified the Constitution. See: www.yale.edu/lawweb/Avalon/federal/fed.htm.
Good luck.
Our Founding Fathers called political parties "factions" because they believed that such groups that held differing opinions were harmful to our national unity. In Federalist Paper Number Ten, James Madison argued against political parties. He said , "The public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties . . ." In his Farewell Address, George Washington also warned against the creation of political parties. He called them "baneful," very harmful, for the nation. MrV
They (actually only some) feared political parties, because of the inherently divisive nature they have. Washington especially feared the country dividing along party lines because people would vote or act in concert with whichever party they belonged to at the time, rather than just for the good of the country. Near the end of his second term, Washington was being villified by members of the Republican party as if he were King George. Parties could also become tyrannical if one became too strong for any other to resist. John Adams felt he would rather go to his grave than become a member of a political party; however, as time went on he was looked to to be the head of the Federalist party. He refused to become the leader of the Federalist, even though he believed in the cause they advocated. Jefferson was a Republican, meaning he was against a strong federal government and was so much devoted to the Republican cause that he actually undermined John Adams' presidency behind the scenes even as he was Adams' vice-president. Judging on how government is run today between the two parties, the ones who opposed political parties were correct in their fears.
I would expect their political views to be politically incorrect, not what the establishment approves of.
Federal departments and agencies would be relatively small
Let's start by defining what is meant by "political stability". A country, usually resource rich, that is under a dictatorship, installed and funded by the western world,where no democratic process exists, and people live in perpetual fear, is called political stability. Another country, also resource rich, with free and fair elections,with several parties(not one) and where people expect control over their resourses, in other words, a healthy, functioning democracy , such as Venezuela. This is always called "political instability" in western propaganda. Margaret Thatcher once said to her murderous buddy Pinochet- "It was you who brought democracy to Chile."
Specific expectations would depend on the president, The people who vote for him expect him to do better than his opponent and honor those campaign pledges that caused them to vote for him. The people who voted against him may expect the worst but hope for the best. Most people probably expect the president to do his best to govern honestly and fairly, to honor his oath to uphold the constitution and to govern for the best interests of the country as he sees them.
1. Even though Franklin still thought the Constitution had some errors, he says that he's been wrong before and may find himself changing his mind later anyway. He'll give in to the better judgment of others.2. The country needed a new government and the structure provided by the Constitution should work if administered well and Franklin though it would be administered well.3. Even if they called another convention, it couldn't come up with a better Constitution than this one.4. "Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good."
They did not rally expect the emergence of political parties. Parties came into existence with the disagreement over how to interpret the Constitution. Hamiltion believed that the Constitution be interpreted loosley. Jefferson and Madison belived that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written. Follwers of Hamilton were Federalists and followers of Jefferson/Madison were Democratic-Republicans. These were the first political parties. They did not rally expect the emergence of political parties. Parties came into existence with the disagreement over how to interpret the Constitution. Hamiltion believed that the Constitution be interpreted loosley. Jefferson and Madison belived that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written. Follwers of Hamilton were Federalists and followers of Jefferson/Madison were Democratic-Republicans. These were the first political parties.
There weren't political parties when the Constitution was written. There were different opinions thus the Federalist and Anti -Federalist which worried people a lot because conflict in the government was seen negatively. Unlike now where we expect our Democrats and Republicans to fight, people excepted our officials to work together and get along. The main reason for political parties not existing was because President Washington was largely against political parties because he believed they would lead to the downfall and destruction of our country.
Political parties influence the political system by organizing and mobilizing voters, selecting candidates, shaping public policy agendas, and providing a platform for political debate. They also help with fundraising, campaign strategy, and garnering public support for their candidates and policies. In essence, political parties play a central role in shaping the direction and functioning of our political system.
First Jamat-i-islam is not an Islamic group but a political party. Government and many political parties expect them to be connected with international terrorist groups. Its mainly for political gain. But there are many of their deeds that were terrorist acts.
Single issue parties form to bring attention to specific causes or problems that are not adequately addressed by mainstream political parties. These parties aim to push their issue to the forefront of the political agenda and promote change through advocacy and mobilization of supporters.
I would expect their political views to be politically incorrect, not what the establishment approves of.
los angles
as long as the job were satisfactory to both parties and everyone was satisfied.
As we set certain qualifications for any job and expect the person coming for that job would abide by that qualification's, similar things should be followed by the leaders of any political parties. The Party should see to it
Federal departments and agencies would be relatively small
increased polarization
Political Science is the study of how government structures work both internally and in conjunction with other governments. A student of political science should expect to learn what the formulations of government policy are on various topics, like economics, sociology, national identity, militancy, democracy, etc.