No, the colonists didn't agree with the Sugar Act and Stamp Act. The colonists protested because each act put taxes on stamps, sugar, molasses and more. Colonists thought it was unfair to them because the British were taxing them. They protested at the side of more acts and they eventually had the Revolutionary War.
The Sedition Act made it illegal to rebel against law and to publish any anti government writings.
The colonist were not being recognized in parliament and no longer lived in England...........basicly the wanted a better goverment. The King was unfairly taxing the colonist which meant that they were loosing money to the king and becoming poorer.
the colonist were mad
Stamp Act
The colonist didn't organize the sugar act. It was a British law.
The sugar act Astrid,
hvfuyfyfv
The colonists had to pay taxes on sugar, molasses, and other sweetened goods. Many of the colonists were outraged and started protests against this.
The colonist didn't organize the sugar act. It was a British law.
tea act *no, its the Sugar Act*
**The suger act lowered the taxes on molasses imported by the colonist
concern and mad i think
There reactions were mild and with no violence.
british made the colonist pay a tax on molases and sugar ,but the colonist were angered.therefore, colonist convinced all 12 colonies except one to stop buying tea from the british, leading up to the stamp act of 1765.
What does it mean that the Sugar Act made it illegal to trade with non-british suppliers
the act lowered the taxes of molasses imported by the colonist