The Radicals were opposed to the "politics of prayers" followed by the Moderates within the Congress. They explored more radical objectives and methods. They emphasised the importance of self reliance and constructive work. They argued that people must rely on their own strength, not on the "good" intentions of the government (as was the stated policy of the Moderates). They believed that people must fight for swaraj .Posted by ayush varma(kv student)
The three estates included conservatives - they did not want to change existing conditions radicals- they wanted to get rid of the king and set up a republic moderates- they had no extreme views and sided with either/or depending on the issue
moderates
The leaders who led the Congress and the National movement from 1885 to 1905 were called moderates because they were staunch believers in open-minded and 'moderate' politics .
i dont really no about moderates and i really need help in this class.....i need answers to do a persuasive essay
moderates and radicles are the our world eople of
The Moderates
Radicals were Patrick Henry, Sam Adams, John Adams, Charles Thompson Moderates were John Dickinson and George Washington
moderate were dirty peoples
The legislation that was passed by the moderates and radicals in 1866 was the Civil Rights Act. It gave the African Americans the freedom to become citizens and to forbid the use of the Black Codes.
The early leaders of the Congress were known as as the Moderates. They believed in asking the English government for reforms. The another group within Congress were called the Radicals. They wanted to oppose the English strongly.
The Moderates-The early leaders of the congress party were called The moderates.eg-Pherozshah mehta T
That is, None of your business sir
the Jacobin
The Radicals were opposed to the "politics of prayers" followed by the Moderates within the Congress. They explored more radical objectives and methods. They emphasised the importance of self reliance and constructive work. They argued that people must rely on their own strength, not on the "good" intentions of the government (as was the stated policy of the Moderates). They believed that people must fight for swaraj .Posted by ayush varma(kv student)
The three estates included conservatives - they did not want to change existing conditions radicals- they wanted to get rid of the king and set up a republic moderates- they had no extreme views and sided with either/or depending on the issue
Surat did not split. the indian national congress split into two (radicals and moderates) during the session in surat in 1907