The government would have become a tyranny if there was no separation of powers
Government is not what the federalists feared to be the most apparent source of tyranny. The federalists supported the idea of government. They actually believed that the most apparent source of tyranny was the Majority Rule - that is to say they thought that the popular majority would be able to unite and "trample on the rules of justice". It was the anti-federalists who believed that government was naturally tyrannical.
All government types have the ability to become "cruel" or "unjust" commonly the term used is "Tyranny" but there have also been many other terms.
In reaction to the tyranny of Hippias.
To protect against tyranny
I think that the leader got (like) forced to be the leader
Tyranny is when a leader becomes corrupt.
I think that the leader got (like) forced to be the leader
Aristotle believed that tyranny was a corrupt and unjust form of government where one person rules in their own self-interest without considering the well-being of the citizens. He thought that tyranny could arise from democracy when the desires of the people are manipulated by a single leader.
tyranny
Tyranny, that's the word you're looking for!The word that best describes a cruel and unjust government is a Tyranny.
Tyranny, that's the word you're looking for!The word that best describes a cruel and unjust government is a Tyranny.
Usually a tyrannical government has a dictator.
Tyranny
Cruel is the rule . :)
Monarchy, Authoritarian Government, Dictatorship, or Tyranny.
olympia