He became a strong supporter to confederation, and the intercolonial railway
yes
the didnt want the convention to create a more executive government
anit-federalists they didnt want the article of confederation to be changed because they thought the national government would be too strong and theyd go back to a government that they just got out of Britain with
because they didnt want to suffer and be in pain anymore by the government.
because they didnt want people taxing them on supplies
because they didnt want a part for the colonies anymore. (protecting)
they didnt want a monarchy
He was all for confederation, he didnt really have a big part in confederation but he had a big part in leading up to confederation.
It didnt? The Articles of Confederation were removed almost a century prior to the Civil War.
The central government was more limited under the Articles Of Confederation than under the Constitution. People did not trust the government to have too much power. It looks like they were right.
they described it as a weakness to some of the governments well to the executive branch the executive branch didnt like the articles of confederation
Because he like pie and they didnt because he was french.
Basically, it was because not all of the 13 colonies agreed with it, and it didnt it was lacking in some areas, like it didnt have a bill of rights, so when we were under the articles of confederation the government could virtually make up and control our rights.
He didnt have a colony......he helped with Confederation....(brung Canada together)
because they were dumb and weak and gave to much power to the states.... i think.
No, they didnt even have any judges like in the today world