0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were the main arguments of the federalist?
The anti-federalists were against a strong central government. They feared that a strong federal government will destroy the hard won liberties they accomplished during the Revolutionary War.
What rhetorical device were the declaration's signers using when they used strong emotional words to describe the grievances against the king?
pathos
What did British conservatives want?
Laissez-faire economic policies Constitutional monarchy
Why were the French willing to help the colonists in their fight against Britain?
There were strong hostilities between the French and the British
What where the advantages that the colonies had to defeat the british?
The colonies had a few advantages over the British. First, they knew the land better. Second, they had a strong sense of patriotism; they deeply believed in the cause they were fighting for.
What strong emotional arguments does Paine use here to demonize the British king?
Jehehej
What is fallacies?
Fallacies are errors in reasoning that weaken arguments by making them unsound or invalid. They can include faulty logic, misleading information, or inappropriate emotional appeals. Recognizing and avoiding fallacies is important for constructing strong, persuasive arguments.
How would you reply to josiah strong arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
What are the distinguished features of cogent and uncogent arguments?
Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.
The work by Rogier van der Weyden the composition of this painting is intended to?
have a strong emotional effect...
What is often strong between a character and the setting he or she lives in?
People always have a strong emotional connection to their homes - doesn't have to be a good connection, but it's always emotional.
How did the Canadians view the war of passchendaele?
Canada viewed the war at Passchendaele in all aspects.. Canada had a very strong emotional tie with Britain," it was stated that the Canadians were more British than the British themselves". However not all Canada had this strong emotional tie only English speaking Canadians French speaking Canadians saw the war being similar to the Boer war and showed no interest. Just as important as the emotional tie with Britain was the restless sprit that effected young men. The sound of war excited them and drew them closer into going. Canadians went to war because of strong emotional ties with Britain but while coming back they came as a proud victorious nation. The war helped them realize they were something more important and bigger than just a small part of the British Empire.
Who were the first types of humans to show to show strong emotional connects to one another?
who were the first types of humans to show strong emotional connects to one another
The Federalist Papers presented strong and convincing arguments in favor of?
adopting the constitution
Is it true that valid arguments are said to be strong or weak?
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
How do you ensure emotional maturity?
In the model of Transactional Analysis, the adult within needs to be strong to ensure emotional maturity.
What is a strong desire to continue something for emotional reasons?
be positive
