The Amendment process is the formal way to change pieces of the Constitution to better suit the nation's rights. According to Article V, two-thirds of Congress must deem it necessary in order to propose an amendment. To ratify the amendment, three-fourths of the states must approve.
they can take any amendment and change its meaning to what they want it to say.
2/3 of each chamber of Congress must approve it, and then it must be ratified by the favorable votes of 3/4 of the state legislatures.
Amending to the Constitution is explained in Article V (Bill of Rights) of the Constitution. The amendment process has two parts, proposal and ratification. Formal proposals are made by either 2/3 of Congress (this is the House of Representatives and the Senate) or a Constitutional Convention when 2/3 of state governments propose an amendment. Ratification requires 3/4 of states' legislatures (38 states) vote or state conventions comprised of delegates elected by the people. Article V also states a third way to ratify an amendment and that is Congress to call for a special convention. This was done once in 1933 when ratifying amendment 21 the repealing amendment 18. This was also the only time states had their own constitutional convention. The executive branch (the President) can only involve itself in ceremonial signings after ratification.
He can but he needs Congress to make that, since Congress makes laws they will have to vote yes and the president of course has the final say around, or they can outvote the presidents decline.
The ratifaction of the fourteenth amendment was almost as controversal as its debates over its proposal, although the amendment with favor in the north,l most southern states rejected it. in 1867, Congress subsequently adopted the military reconstruction act, providing that states of the confederacy could be readmitted to the union without military rule if they ratified the fourteenth amendment. several subsequently did so. at about that time, New Jersey and Ohio attempted to rescind their ratifications. secretary of state William Seward presented the facts to Congress, which declared the amendment adopted. at least one other state appears to have ratified the amendment prior to the congressional votes, and other ratifications followed before any judicial desicions based on the amendment. Moreover, congress had not previously found it necessary to take a separate step to "promulgate" an amendment.
The amendment was written in Congress like all the other amendments.
2/3
3/5
No. Any citizen of the United States can propose a Constitutional Amendment, but it won't formally enter the process of amending the Constitution until either Congress or the State Legislatures take it up. That process doesn't include any input from the President at all. In fact, the President may share his opinion of a Constitutional Amendment, but he may not veto it or in any way interfere with the process. Furthermore, the Courts have no jurisdiction over the process of ratifying a Constitutional Amendment either. If you consider Congress and the State Legislatures to be representatives of the people's will, then only the People may formally ratify a Constitutional Amendment. This is best represented by the 18th and 21st Amendments and how the People decided to amend the Constitution and then decided to undo the same Amendment.
No. To change the amendment would take another amendment to the Constitution. The Congress would have to introduce and pass the amendment, then three fourths of the States would have to accept the amendment before it would become ratified.
a amendment to constitution in usa
There are 2 ways to change the U.S. Constitution.The first way is for two thrids of both houses of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) to propose a constitutional amendment. Once this happens, the proposed amendment is submitted to the states. The legislatures of 3/4 of the states must ratify the amendment. At this point, it becomes part of the constitution. The president has no official role in amendment the constitution (he doesn't have to sign the amendment for it to take effect, and can do nothing to defeat a constitutional amendment once it has passed). Of course, unofficially, presidents can use their political clout to influence public opinion one way or another, which can affect the chances of a constitutional amendment passing.The second method starts with the states, and was likely included to give states a check on overreaching federal power. The legislatures of the states apply to congress for a convention to propose amendments to the constitution. If 2/3 of the states make such applications, congress must call the convention. Once such a convention is called, and amendments are proposed, the amendment(s) must be ratified by the legislatures of 3/4 of the states. This method has never actually been used to amend the constitution, but Congress has proposed amendments in response to threats by states to call a convention, likely to retain some control over the amendment process.
The congress can't take away the right to a trial because it is written as an Amendment in the Constitution. If they tried to take that right away that would be completely unconstitutional.
they can take any amendment and change its meaning to what they want it to say.
The Executive and the Judicial branches are not involved in the constitutional amendment process.The Constitution only requires Congress and the States to take part.
The 20th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution specifies the date that the President and Congress take office.
The US Congress has the power to propose changes, but they do not take effect unless three-fourths of the state legislatures ratify them.