answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Highly dangerous when only one state was voting at a time. This was a magnet for every bully-boy in America, from both sides, to descend on that one thinly-populated area and intimidate voters.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did Bleeding Kansas demonstrate that popular sovereignty was?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the result of Bleeding Kansas?

popular sovereignty was an unworkable solution for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska


Why did popular sovereignty in fact lead to Bleeding Kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory?

Popular sovereignty allowed each territory to decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote. This led to intense and violent conflicts like Bleeding Kansas because pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded the territory to sway the vote in their favor, resulting in armed confrontations and confusion. The inability to peacefully settle the issue in Kansas-Nebraska demonstrated the limitations and flaws of popular sovereignty as a solution to the slavery debate.


Why popular sovereignty did not work in Kansas?

Because it was the only state voting at that time, so it attracted every terrorist from both sides to intimidate voters. The resulting violence was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.


What bill passed by congress which included the principle of popular sovereignty?

The Kansas-Nebraska of 1854 allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebrask to vote on whether to allow slavery, which is what "popular sovereignty" or "squatter sovereignty" meant.


What was written primarily for the state of Kansas?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was primarily written for the state of Kansas. This act allowed for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether they would allow slavery based on popular sovereignty. It ultimately led to violence and conflict in Kansas known as "Bleeding Kansas."


When did Kansas get the name bleeding Kansas?

In the period of time after the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by Congress, there was armed conflict between pro and anti slavery factions in the Kansas territory. Bleeding Kansas was the result of popular sovereignty. At the time the idea birthed by Senator Stephen Douglas seemed the American way to settle disputes. Few expected the violence that erupted in Kansas soon after the Act was passed.


When was popular sovereignty?

Popular sovereignty was used before the Civil War to determine if the state wanted slavery or not. Nebraska and Kansas voted on these issues.


What right did states get through the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

popular sovereignty


What did the situation in Kansas in the mid 1850s indicate the impracticality of?

Popular Sovereignty


What is a good sentence for Kansas Nebraska act?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 called for "popular sovereignty."


Why popular sovereignty?

Political doctrine that allowed the settlers of U.S. federal territories to decide whether to enter the Union as free or slave states. It was applied by Sen. stephen-a-douglasas a means to reach a compromise through passage of the kansas-nebraska-act. Critics of the doctrine called it "squatter sovereignty." The resulting violence between pro- and antislavery factions (see bleeding-kansas) showed its failure as a workable compromise.Read more: popular-sovereignty


What is the name of the legislation during Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854?

Popular Sovereignty