we needed a central voice to represent america
The Anti-Federalists were of the idea a weaker federal government in favor of stronger state legislatures and did not entertain the idea of a new constitution.
They were called Federalists.
The question is incomplete. There are no options given (for "which of the following") to answer this question.
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
they wrote the federalists essays in which they pleaded their case
The argument of the Anti-Federalists was against a strong central government. They feared it would destroy the liberties Americans secured during the Revolutionary War.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
The argument of the Anti-Federalists was against a strong central government. They feared it would destroy the liberties Americans secured during the Revolutionary War.
by loling
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
The federalists promised to attach a bill of rights because the anti-federalists were writing series of papers like the federalists and by attaching the bill of rights the anti-federalists no longer had an argument. Which means the federalists won and were able to keep the constitution. They were the first ten amendments to the constitution.
we needed a central voice to represent america
it had features that prevented the abuses of government powers
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
they had an argument because there was no Bill of Rights and also the executive branch held too much power.
The Anti-Federalists were of the idea a weaker federal government in favor of stronger state legislatures and did not entertain the idea of a new constitution.