No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
Primary Source
When researching American independence or almost any founding-period subject, the Declaration of Independence is indeed a primary source. The difference between primary sources and secondary sources hinges on this simple distinction: a primary source is (or was) "there", while a secondary source is (or was) not "there" but instead talks "about" it.
Yes, The data collected in a survey is a primary source, and conclusions based on that data would be a secondary source.
A primary source might be a letter, photograph, or speech that
secondary
yes
is pericles primary source or secondary source
a letter is an example of a primary source, in other words, a firsthand account. hope this helps! :)
If you are reading the actual letter, or an exact quote from that letter, it is a primary source.
It is a primary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
Primary would be the first of whatever you're talking about, and secondary would be the second or the once-removed whatever it is. For example, a primary source of research would be something like a diary or letter, which would be a first-line information source - a secondary source would be a textbook reporting about what the person described in the letter or diary.
it is a primary source
secondary
Secondary source
It is a secondary source.