answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that the government could not make laws that punished people for using inflammatory speech, however, this does not include speech that incites what is referred to as imminent lawless action. The case was Brandenburg v. Ohio.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In 1969 supreme court broadened the protections afforded political speech?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In 1969 the Supreme Court significantly broadened the protections afforded political speech by?

overturning the conviction of a member of the Ku Klux Klan


What protections does the supreme court judges have?

secret service protection


What supreme court decisions expand the protections of assistance of counsel?

Gideon v Wainwright


Who broadened the Supreme courts power?

Chief Justice John Marshall


. What was the significance of Supreme Court's ruling in In re Gault?

It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections.


What was the significance of supreme courts ruling in re gault?

It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections.


Supreme political power or authority?

Sovereignty


Do the us supreme court justices reflect and support the political agenda?

yes"the us supreme court justices reflect and support the political agenda


What do you think of Supreme Court Justices having political party affiliations?

Supreme Court Justices do not necessarily have parties because they do not run for a political seat. The criteria for a supreme court justice has to be someone who is familiar with the law such as a former lawyer. If Supreme Court justices ran on a political platform that could complicate the position they hold because many political parties have money or a platform they run on.


What did the supreme court decide about children's rights?

Children were generally afforded basic rights embodied in the constitution, born in a marriage or not, excluding children not yet born


In a 2004 case involving the issue of whether a US citizen accused of terrorist acts is entitled to constitutional protections the Supreme Court held that such citizens?

In the 2004 case Hamdi vs. Rumsfield the Supreme Court held that citizens accused of terrorist acts are entitled to constitutional protections. Hamdi, a US citizen was captured in Afghanistan and turned over to the US military. He was classified as a enemy combatant.


What is the major political party in North Korea?

The major political party in North Korea is The Supreme Peoples Assembly.