The filibuster can be used in the Senate but not in the House
Neither really has "more" power. They have differentpowers. Neither of them can really "overrule" the other, because generally they have to agree for anything to happen. For example, only the House can impeach an elected official, but only the Senate can convict someone who has been impeached. The House and Senate must agree in order to remove someone from office; if the House impeaches them but the Senate doesn't convict them, then nothing happens, and if the House doesn't impeach them in the first place then the Senate can't convict them so again nothing happens.There are certain things that are reserved to either the House or Senate, but again, it's not really a question of "more power".That said: Senators serve (normally) for six years, while Representatives serve for only two. There are far fewer Senators than Representatives, so each Senator's vote has more "weight" than each Representative's does. The Senate is considered the "Upper" chamber of the Legislative branch. For all these reasons, it's not entirely wrong to say the Senate has more power ... but it's not entirely right, either.
One, they both have bicameral legislature. In Great Britain this is known as parlament. It includes the house of lords and the house of commons. The house of commons has more power. While in Japan, it's known as the National diet. The upper house is known as the house of Councillors, an the lower is known as the house of representatives.
The House Of Representatives has 435 people in it. The senate has 100 people.
House of RepresentativesThe House of Representatives brings charges, called "articles of impeachment," against officials it considers guilty of criminal or ethical violations. If a simple majority of the House votes to support the charges, the judge is impeached. He or she then proceeds to trial in the Senate.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
lower house
House of Commons. The Senate is seen as a national joke and not many people respect the Senate or Senators. Senate seats are nothing more than a patronage appointment.
The grren carpet is more preetty
The House does have more power over the Senate when it comes to the nation's money.
The House of Commons has far more authority and power, despite being a "lower house". The House of Lords actually has more members, but they don't always show up. The House of Lords can use its power to slow up prospective new legislation
Senators review bills passed by the elected House of Commons.The powers of the Senate and the House of Commons are equal, with two exceptions: (a) the Senate may not propose money bills that would need a Royal Recommendation, or amend a money bill in such a way that would cause it to need a new Royal Recommendation; and (b) the Senate may not suspend some types of constitutional amendments for more than one hundred eighty days.In most circumstances, the Senate bows to the democratic weight of the House of Commons when disagreements between the two Houses arise. However, the Senate is nonetheless empowered to defeat bills (even budget implementation bills) passed by the House of Commons, or to insist upon amendments that the Senate favours. If the Senate and House of Commons cannot agree on a bill, it cannot be presented for royal assent to become law.
the duties of the congress divided between the house and senate are that the senate tends to have more power than representatives
House of Commons
House of Commons
No.The Canadian House of Commons has 308 seats.
The Senate gives equal power to all states, thus giving less populated states more power than they have in the House of Representatives, where power is determined by population.
Yes it is much more powerful