Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............ Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............
Inter is a prefix for either inside or involved, to say you are inter means you are involved within something. While Generational Tyranny means a form of tyranny that passes on the sins of your father. To elaborate: Generational Tyranny would be that your father owed money and so by defacto of you being his son you are born into his debts. This doesn't deal strictly with debts alone but also contracts. Generational Tyranny would say that you are obligated to follow the laws of your forefather. Note that the above paragraph asserts that you under Generational Tyranny would not have any say in the matter of your contracts or debts inherited. Generational Tyranny claims that the the rulings of a few control the decisions of many even the ones who refuse and that no action is determined by the individual but rather a part of the Tyranny as all parties even the tyrant are conditioned to continue to support Generational Tyranny. Inter Generational Tyranny would be speaking of the interconnection between the various parties or specifically the platform of the interconnection. It could be a made up prefix to that word.
Government is not what the federalists feared to be the most apparent source of tyranny. The federalists supported the idea of government. They actually believed that the most apparent source of tyranny was the Majority Rule - that is to say they thought that the popular majority would be able to unite and "trample on the rules of justice". It was the anti-federalists who believed that government was naturally tyrannical.
Is democracy. Democracy was first shown in Greece so they could vote for a leader. It means to vote by yourself without a representative like the Romans. We Americans have been using this system for decades.
In any democracy, the people have a say in what goes on ( this is why we vote) this is often considered power.
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
yes Democracy is the Tyranny of the Majority. That's why we are supposed to be a Constitutional Republic. That way the minorities rights are protected against mob rule. The word democracy is not in the Declaration of Independence, or the Bill of Rights. Our founding fathers hated democracy. We the People have rights that no one can vote or legislate away. At least that's what was intended. Today the government is so out of control, they disregard the Constitution when ever they want. That's tyranny. When the government fear the people you have Freedom. When the people fear the government you have Tyranny.
When James Madison speaks of the "tyranny of the majority" he means that the private and self-serving interests of the majority sacrificing the public good. He solved this problem by making a large electorate and a representative government.
James Madison believed that America should not be ruled by America and that America was a Christian nation.James Madison was actually an early satanist. He actually wrote the earliest version of the satanic bible with Anton Levay later based his version on.
madison
The citizens can get a say in what is happening.
well, the idea of democracy is that everyone has a fair say in how their country is run. elections make this possible by letting people choose their own leader
Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............ Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............
Tyranny is a government ruled by a single person, or tyrannt. The people rarely, if ever, have a say in what he/she does in their all-powerful position.
Tyranny is a government ruled by a single person, or tyrannt. The people rarely, if ever, have a say in what he/she does in their all-powerful position.
Pros of direct democracy include increased citizen participation, more direct representation, and potential for greater accountability of government officials. However, cons can include the risk of majority tyranny, potential for uninformed decision-making, and inefficiency in decision-making due to the need to involve all citizens in the process.