That's a complex question. Yes, laws can limit our freedom, but they can also enhance it.
Take driver's licenses for instance. You could see the law requiring them as a limiting factor, and feel repressed by the strict consequences that you would face if you drove without one. On the other hand, if that law didn't exist, then we all might feel a little bit less safe on the roadways. So, that law limits us, but also grants us the freedom, generally, to drive in a safe environment.
Laws or rules are also often required to gain a skill. If doctors could just declare themselves doctors without rules for licensing or amount of practice actually doing doctory things, then there would be a much wider gap in skill level than there currently is, and people might die more often when doctors made mistakes trying to do things that they didn't know how to do. Practice isn't officially a rule in all professions, but it is required in order to learn skills... no one could become a concert pianist or a gymnast without practicing.
Of course, not all laws are ones that enhance our freedom, and so some might be more limiting than otherwise... but even in the limiting category, they usually help. Preventing us from harming others and forcing us to take vengeance to court rather than into our own hands might not solve our actual problem, but overall it helps society to be a better place and limits the ability of people to harm us without consequences.
Some laws are just straight up unjust, and even cruel, and certainly they don't all do good... it depends on the country and the area and who makes them, and so many things. But good laws definitely don't only limit us.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the federal legislature from making laws that establish religion (the "Establishment Clause") or prohibit free exercise of religion (the "Free Exercise Clause"), laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to assemble peaceably, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
it means freedom No it means there is a limit to the degree of control the state has over the citizen it does not mean freedom.
yes the revolutionary war stayed laws because they wanted to have freedom
Depends who you are.... extremest liberal or conservative would say we have no freedom.. Anyone else would say we have enough freedom but we have laws so its not communism nor is it anarchy
Compulsory educationParental freedom is limited when parents are forced to provide a certain type or level of education for their children
The 1935 Nuremberg Laws were created to limit the Jews freedom.
They passed Jim Crow laws and what they called equal but separate laws.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the federal legislature from making laws that establish religion (the "Establishment Clause") or prohibit free exercise of religion (the "Free Exercise Clause"), laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to assemble peaceably, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom to go against british laws and to get freedom
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the federal legislature from making laws that establish religion (the "Establishment Clause") or prohibit free exercise of religion (the "Free Exercise Clause"), laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to assemble peaceably, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
how did shihuangdi try to limit people's freedom
No law has EVER limited religion in the United States. The constitution guarantees the freedom of religion in the bill of rights.
No, restricting freedom is always wrong. But it may be less wrong than what would happen if you didn't set a limit.
The purpose of the Jim Crow laws were to limit and restrict the voting freedom of African-Americans.
Freedom of expression
While laws may seem to limit your freedoms, laws also guarantee Individual liberties.
While laws may seem to limit your freedoms, laws also guarantee Individual liberties.