Liberals and conservatives would likely not be in favor of the exclusive power of Congress. It is referred to as the elastic clause.
The Mayflower compact would be a better example of Direct Democracy then Indirect Democracy. This is because the agreement was ment so that the British Gov could not easily control them as everyone would have a say in it and decide wether it was wise to let the Britsh Gov interfere. An Indirect demo would be where citizens would tell their elected official their opinions and he would report to the king. Our US gov is a good example of Indirect democracy though it also shares a few beliefs with Direct Democracy.
A direct democracy is a democracy that is controlled by direct voting. Whoever gets the most votes wins. Basically, the one with the most votes would get the Presidency.
theset up a direct democracy,in which all men would vote, and the mayority would rule. the may flower compact established a tradition of direct democracy .
Democracy was invented so that the normal people (pesants) would also have a saying in politics not just the rich and famous. Without democracy much of the world that we know wouldยดnt be the same since WE ALL get to decide who rules our countries (for example: Trump would have won this years election because in america there are a lot more Republicans than demokrats) in conclusion be happy that we have it. end of story.
no
In the Jeffersonian democracy presidential candidates would be chosen by caucuses that were held by political leaders. In a Jacksonian democracy the candidates would be chosen by conventions.
I wouldn't agree with that statement to any extant. Look at every country that isn't under a democracy or a republic, they have little to no human rights.
democracy had only proved to slow government and governing down and had just led to the rise of the next would-be dictator.
Some of Jackson's notables would be the Jacksonian Democracy, Jackson's Indian Removal Act, the Spoils System and Jackson's war on the Banks
a supporter is helpful to what is wanted to be done
hehe we have the exact same question!! Unites States History 8th grade textbook huh?? Anyways,I think it would be John Locke.
it depends on how the person personally feels. not all dictators are evil people. if the person was to only slightly favor democracy then yes it is possible to favor a dictator. it is also possible to favor the dictator simply because he/she is doing a good job.
technology
I would favor constitutional amendments if they enhance individual rights, promote equality, or address pressing issues in society. On the other hand, I would oppose amendments that infringe on basic rights, discriminate against certain groups, or undermine the core principles of democracy.
No! :)
Pure democracy essentially means that majority opinion rules; the Framers feared that this would oppress the rights of minorities. So, they provided a framework for a republican form of government, consisting of elected representatives.