Nope sorry it doesn't have a 9" rear... It's an 8.8 integral rear where the 9" has a removable carrier aka: pumpkin... I only wish my 1989 Mark VII had a 9" because it was an still is a bullet proof rear!!! I had to rebuild mine once and it is in need of another rebuild. I wish I had the money to fabricate a 9" into my Lincoln I would have done this a long time ago... They do have housings for the Mustangs of this era but the Lincoln is wider and a little different then the Mustang...
yes it will
not today.
Nope
go to a junk yard and get the whole 8.8 inch rear end from a 86-93 lincoln. there are plenty Ford/Lincoln were not equipped with Posi-Traction. That term is used by the GM world. If your Mark VII was not equipped with Trac-Loc, you can search the junk yards and you can identify them by the sticker that is located in the driver door opening. Or you can purchase a trac-loc system from Ford Racing for some cash.
Depends most likely a 256 or a 272 I have seen both if its two wheel drive.
i think the normal rear end already has two wheel drive because my '86 chev S10 has 2wd already built in unless Posi-tract is more different but i think there not much of a difference just tryin to save you money
You don't. It uses a small amount of transmission grease similar to the grease in the rear end.
There are 2.54 centimetres in one inch. Therefore, rounded to two decimal places, 86 centimetres is equal to 86/2.54 = 33.86 inches.
I ASSUME axle code " 86 " is the same as it is on the ( 1996 ) Ford Ranger ( 3.73 gear ratio , conventional / non - limited slip )
Usually a Dana 35, unless it has the metric ton package. Then it would have the Dana 44.
14 inch
Lincoln: (capital city) 40º 86' N, 96º 68' W