Nope sorry it doesn't have a 9" rear... It's an 8.8 integral rear where the 9" has a removable carrier aka: pumpkin... I only wish my 1989 Mark VII had a 9" because it was an still is a bullet proof rear!!! I had to rebuild mine once and it is in need of another rebuild. I wish I had the money to fabricate a 9" into my Lincoln I would have done this a long time ago... They do have housings for the Mustangs of this era but the Lincoln is wider and a little different then the Mustang...
yes it will
not today.
Nope
go to a junk yard and get the whole 8.8 inch rear end from a 86-93 lincoln. there are plenty Ford/Lincoln were not equipped with Posi-Traction. That term is used by the GM world. If your Mark VII was not equipped with Trac-Loc, you can search the junk yards and you can identify them by the sticker that is located in the driver door opening. Or you can purchase a trac-loc system from Ford Racing for some cash.
Depends most likely a 256 or a 272 I have seen both if its two wheel drive.
i think the normal rear end already has two wheel drive because my '86 chev S10 has 2wd already built in unless Posi-tract is more different but i think there not much of a difference just tryin to save you money
You don't. It uses a small amount of transmission grease similar to the grease in the rear end.
I ASSUME axle code " 86 " is the same as it is on the ( 1996 ) Ford Ranger ( 3.73 gear ratio , conventional / non - limited slip )
There are 2.54 centimetres in one inch. Therefore, rounded to two decimal places, 86 centimetres is equal to 86/2.54 = 33.86 inches.
Usually a Dana 35, unless it has the metric ton package. Then it would have the Dana 44.
14 inch
Lincoln: (capital city) 40º 86' N, 96º 68' W