In linear block codes we use individual registers seperately for message bits and for parity bits while transmitting where in case of convolutional codes we use only one register and here the left most bit is the message bit and remaining are parity bits
product means multiplication. y + z 3 doesnt make any sense. please re-ask question but more clearly. you can message me on my message board if you have any questions.
Dogs often have a ruff life
I'm sorry, but without the specific algebra problem or context from page 95 of Algebra with Pizzazz, I can't provide the answer to the hidden message. Algebra with Pizzazz is a series of textbooks that contain various algebraic problems with hidden messages to solve. If you provide the specific algebra problem or context from page 95, I can help guide you through solving it to reveal the hidden message.
because someone wanted to send a message that no one else could understand
It seems to me that the two are completely unrelated, so I don't see a reason to try to compare them.
Message to method bindingA question of whether a message should bind toa method in the class to which the reference variable pointing to the receiver was declared to be an instance of (static binding), ora method in the class to which the receiver is an instance of at run-time (dynamic binding).Dynamic bindingin the context of OOP typically refers to the binding of methods to messagesmethods varying dynamically entails much of the power of the OO approachmain source of power in an OO languagesearch for method (code body) to bind to a message starts from the class to which the receiver currently (i.e., at run-time) is an instance of, and and proceeds up the class inheritance hierarchy from there (static binding initiates the search from the class to which the reference variable pointing to the receiver was declared to be an instance of)if no method found anywhere, a run-time error (method not found) is reported and this is typically the only error in a Smalltalk program ever detected and reportedexample: Mammal m; Cow c; if (user input) m = new Cow; // if static binding used, run method in class Mammal bound to run message here // if dynamic binding used, run method in class Cow bound to run message here m.run else c = new Cow; c.runWhy dynamic binding?`to allow software systems to be more easily extended during both development and maintenance' [COPL] p. 461allows dynamic polymorphism, consider sorting (written in a general way)obviates need for abstract classes (e.g., Fruit class, peel method)while other forms of dynamism in languages tend to be compromise efficiency in the run-time system, dynamic binding involves little overheadDynamic vs. static bindingadvantages of each?disadvantages of each?Message to method binding in languagesSmalltalk dynamic by defaultby sending a message to super we can initiate the search (for the method to bind to the message) in the parent class of the class to which the sender belongs (i.e., like sending a message to self with a different entry point for the search (not quite static binding))Java and Eiffel dynamic by defaultin Java, preface method with final qualifier to prevent any subclass from overriding itin Eiffel, preface method with frozen qualifier to prevent any subclass from overriding itC++ static by default (why?)preface method with virtual qualifier for dynamic binding; the search for the method to bind to the message starts in the class which defines the method prefaced with the virtual qualifier and proceeds down the inheritance hierarchy from there to the class to which the receiver object belongsObjective-C, Modula-3, Python, and Ruby use dynamic binding for all methodsSimula, C# and Ada 95 use static binding by default and support dynamic binding as an optionDynamic binding ambiguityDo not confuse dynamic binding of messages to methods with dynamic allocation and deallocations of objects.Smalltalk: manual dynamic allocation, automatic deallocationJava: manual dynamic allocation, automatic deallocationC++: manual dynamic allocation, manual deallocation
the difference between channel and medium is that channel is the form how the message will be while medium is the actual message
Yes, a text message can be legally binding if it meets the requirements for a contract, such as offer, acceptance, and consideration, and if both parties intend for it to be legally binding.
The difference between a telegram and a telegraph is that a telegram is a message communicated through delivered in written or printed message from while a letter is written or printed message usually in envelop sent by post.
queued message are system defined message and nonqueed message are applicaton defined message.
There is no reason why a text message 'contract' should not be legally binding, however there have not been any precedent setting cases on the issue.
massage is a word or phrase that is sent. a massage is also a action of rubbing and caressing the body for relaxation
I also left you a voice message in regard to this manner.
Yes, a text message can be legally binding in California if it meets the requirements for a valid contract, such as offer, acceptance, and consideration. It is important to carefully consider the content and context of the text message to determine its legal implications.
No, a text message alone typically does not constitute a legally binding agreement.
less importnt to the message of a business document but more important to the message of academic paper.