If you are the maker of the check - that is, the person who is writing the check to pay someone else - you should sign on the front of the check and NOT on the back. The back of the check is for the payee's endorsement. The front of the check has a signature line for the maker to sign.
No, they cannot. It is illegal to sign the check that belongs to someone else. However in case of joint accounts it is enough if either of the account holders sign the check and it is perfectly legal too.
You sign the back. She has to sign beneath your name. Then, you can cash it or deposit it.
You can use black or blue ink to sign on a check. Actually there is no restriction on the color you can use to sign on a check as long as it does not blot on the check paper. Also, your writing should be clear and legible so that the bank authorities can verify it accurately.
yes
check with your state or municipal authority. most states require a statue or ordinance to erect any kind of sign......................................
It depends whether it is a subtraction, mulitplication, addition, or division problem.
no
To sign the back of a check is to endorse it.
It's unfortunate and kind of gross, but many people consider it a sign of good luck.
sign the check in chinese
It is a regulatory sign
To transfer a check to another person you can sign the back and have them sign the back, as well. Once they sign the check, it is their check.
What kind of sign are you talking about.
If you are the maker of the check - that is, the person who is writing the check to pay someone else - you should sign on the front of the check and NOT on the back. The back of the check is for the payee's endorsement. The front of the check has a signature line for the maker to sign.
If it is made payable to you, yes. If you are the remitter (purchaser - person paying with the check), no.
Warning sign.