Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
The definition of skeptical is “Unbelievable” or “Doubtful”
It's SKEPTICAL. Here are some sentences.I'm skeptical about your ability to use the spell-check program.He gave me a skeptical glance.She has a skeptical attitude toward everything.
"The people were skeptical when the scientist told them that his son was taken by extraterrestrials."
It is important for a scientist to be open minded but skeptical so that he/she will gather the information on a direct observation instead of on a feeling.
When scientists are skeptical, the are more likely to find new thing. When scientists are not skeptical, they are less open to opportunities. For example, if scientists were not skeptical of the idea the Earth was flat, then they would have continued many many more years without knowing the true shape of the world. Also, without scientists skepticism, they would not have found out that the planets rotated around the sun, not that everything rotates around Earth.
Scientists need to be skeptical in order to question assumptions, critically evaluate evidence, and ensure the validity and reliability of their findings. By being skeptical, scientists can avoid bias, uncover errors, and make more accurate conclusions based on empirical evidence.
Being skeptical helps scientists to critically evaluate evidence, question assumptions, and consider alternative explanations. This approach fosters a stronger scientific method, leading to more reliable results and advancements in knowledge.
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
Other scientists were skeptical about Mendeleev's periodic table because it contained gaps for elements that had not yet been discovered and because it did not follow strict atomic weights as a basis for organization. Additionally, there was skepticism about his prediction of the properties of undiscovered elements.
Scientists are skeptical about the Loch Ness monster because there is no solid proof that the monster exists. They will do nothing about it until there is some proof.
Well first of all, the term "scientists" is a very broad term. But as far as things we all have in common, we all use the scientific method, and there's this idea that scientists are skeptical. To what extent that is true is entirely dependent on the person themselves, but science is more-or-less questioning things and explaining things. And to question things, you kinda have to be a bit skeptical.
Scientists must have a skeptical attitude. As well, all Experiments are conducted by The Scientific Method.
The definition of skeptical is “Unbelievable” or “Doubtful”
ballsNo sir, that is not the answer.Try again.-Answers.com
A good word to use in place of incredulous is skeptical.
Because scientists have an inquiring mind and believe in the scientific method - anything is possible.