answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Carbon-14 isotope dating is only effective up to about 70,000 years. Dinosaur bones are at least 65 million years old. Elements with much longer half-lives are used to radiometrically date rock associated with dinosaur remains.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

8mo ago

Carbon dating is ineffective for determining the age of dinosaur bones because carbon dating can only be used on organic materials that are less than 60,000 years old. Dinosaur bones are millions of years old and do not contain sufficient carbon for accurate dating. Instead, other methods like radiometric dating are used to determine the age of dinosaur bones.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is carbon dating ineffective in determining the age of a dinosaur bone?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How accurate is carbon dating in determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

Carbon dating is a reliable method for determining the age of archaeological artifacts, but it is not always 100 accurate due to potential sources of error.


Is carbon dating flawed in its accuracy and reliability when determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

Carbon dating is generally accurate and reliable for determining the age of archaeological artifacts, but it can have limitations and potential sources of error. Factors such as contamination and calibration issues can affect the accuracy of carbon dating results. Scientists take these factors into account when interpreting carbon dating data to ensure the most accurate age estimates possible.


Can radiocarbon dating be used to determine the age of dinosaur fossils?

No, radiocarbon dating cannot be used to determine the age of dinosaur fossils because the half-life of carbon-14 is too short for dating objects that are millions of years old. Instead, other dating methods like uranium-lead dating or potassium-argon dating are used for dating dinosaur fossils.


Why is carbon 14 dating useless for dating old coins?

Carbon 14 dating is not useful for dating old coins because the method is only effective for dating organic materials that were once alive, such as wood or bones. Coins are typically made of inorganic materials (metals) that do not contain carbon, making carbon 14 dating ineffective for determining their age accurately.


How do you use the term carbon dating in a sentence?

The term 'carbon dating' is a compound noun, a word for the process of determining of the age of an organic matter from the relative proportions of the carbon isotopes it contains. A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition. Example sentence: Carbon dating has helped anthropologists speed up the process of determining the age of their specimens. (subject of the sentence)


What are the flaws in carbon dating that may affect the accuracy of determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

One flaw in carbon dating is the assumption that the amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has remained constant over time, which may not always be true. Additionally, contamination from external sources or incomplete sample combustion can also affect the accuracy of determining the age of archaeological artifacts using carbon dating.


How accurate is the c14 carbon dating method in determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

The C14 carbon dating method is generally accurate in determining the age of archaeological artifacts, but it may have limitations and potential sources of error. It is important to consider factors such as contamination and calibration when interpreting the results.


Why do some scientists argue that carbon dating is flawed as a method for determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

Some scientists argue that carbon dating is flawed for determining the age of archaeological artifacts because it can be affected by factors like contamination, calibration issues, and the assumption of constant decay rates.


Why is carbon dating often considered inaccurate in determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

Carbon dating is often considered inaccurate in determining the age of archaeological artifacts because it relies on the assumption that the amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has remained constant over time, which may not always be the case due to factors like changes in the Earth's magnetic field or human activities. Additionally, contamination or mixing of different carbon sources can also affect the accuracy of carbon dating results.


What are the problems with carbon dating and how do they impact the accuracy of determining the age of archaeological artifacts?

Carbon dating can be affected by contamination, sample size, and calibration issues, which can impact the accuracy of determining the age of archaeological artifacts. Contamination from modern carbon sources can skew results, while small sample sizes may not provide a reliable date. Calibration issues, such as fluctuations in atmospheric carbon levels, can also affect accuracy. These problems can lead to inaccuracies in dating artifacts, making it important to consider multiple factors when interpreting carbon dating results.


Why is carbon dating not useful for determining the age of human artifacts that are 100000 years old?

Carbon dating is limited to around 50,000 years due to the half-life of the carbon-14 isotope. Once an artifact exceeds this range, there is not enough carbon-14 left to accurately measure its age. Other dating methods, such as uranium-lead dating, are used for older artifacts.


What can carbon dating be used to date?

Carbon dating can be used to date organic materials, such as wood, bones, shells, and charcoal. It is particularly useful for determining the age of archaeological artifacts and fossils that are up to about 50,000 years old.