answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Many courts upheld the common law doctrine, "once free, always free" that automatically granted emancipation to any slave who had lived in territory where slavery was prohibited, under the theory that once a person was free he (or she) couldn't be returned to slavery.

Dred Scott lived with Dr. Emerson at a military post in Rock Island, Illinois, in 1834. He also lived in the federal territory of Fort Snelling (now part of Minnesota), which prohibited slavery per the Missouri Compromise of 1820, as well the unincorporated federal Wisconsin Territories, which prohibited slavery per the Northwest Ordinance.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did Dred Scott claim that he was free?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?

Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.


What did Dred Scott base his claim of freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What did Scott base on his claim for freedom on?

Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.


Ask us did Dred Scott base his claim for freedom on?

Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was illegal, which he believed should entitle him to freedom. He argued that his time in these locations had made him a free man under the law.


What did Dred Scott claim John Sanford did to him and his family?

First of all, John Sandford was not the original defendant in the case. The original defendant was Irene Emerson, Dred Scott's owner. John Sandford was Irene Emerson's brother, and acted on her behalf. As such, Dred Scott never claimed that John Sandford did anything to his family. Now as far as Irene Emerson goes, Dred Scott claimed that she was harming him and his family by not allowing them to be free, in violation of the Missouri Compromise. Scott's claim was that since he had lived in free states (namely, Illinois and Wisconsin Territory) where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery, that should have made him free.


What did Dred Scott base his claim for freedom?

That he had once lived on free soil, where his freedom would have been granted automatically, if he had applied for it then.


Why did Dred Scott claim that he became a freeman by entering the Louisiana Territory?

Because the Louisiana Territory wasn't divided into free or slave states yet.


How much Did Dr John Emerson pay for Dred Scott?

Dr. John Emerson did not pay for Dred Scott; rather, he was owned by other individuals before eventually being owned by the Emerson family. Dred Scott's legal case revolved around his claim to freedom based on having lived in free territories, despite being a slave.


Who said that he should be free because he lived in a free territory?

Dred Scott.


How was dred Scott discriminated?

because they said "slaves are property" and said that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional and they wanted to keep slaves out of western territory and any slaves found free would be back in captivity and even though Dred Scott was free for 19 years they still made him to be a slave because of the Dred Scott vs. Sanford .That is how Dred Scott was discriminated.


What was the issue in the dred Scott case?

He was a slave in a free state