answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

well, to put it simply neither would win. Its a Paradox.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

7mo ago

If an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object, it would result in a paradox, as both scenarios contradict each other. It is an age-old philosophical question that lacks a definitive answer.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would win unstoppable force or an unmovable object?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Physics

What happens when an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object?

This scenario presents a logical paradox because if the force is truly unstoppable, then it should be able to move any object regardless of its immovability. However, if the object is truly unmovable, then no force, not even an unstoppable one, should be able to move it. This dilemma illustrates the limitations of our understanding of physics and the concept of infinity.


What happens when an unstopable object meets an unmovable object and they collide together?

This scenario presents a paradox, as an unstoppable object would not be able to be stopped by any force, while an immovable object cannot be moved by any force. In reality, such objects cannot coexist within the same universe.


What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?

This classic paradox poses a hypothetical scenario where contradictory conditions exist. If an irresistible force exists, it should be able to overcome any resistance, but if an immovable object exists, it cannot be moved by any force. In reality, it is impossible for both concepts to coexist, as their definitions would cancel each other out.


What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?

It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.


Who would win-an immovable object or an unstoppable force?

This is a classic paradoxical question. If the object is truly immovable, then the force cannot move it. Similarly, if the force is truly unstoppable, then the object cannot prevent it from moving. It's a situation where both possibilities contradict each other, leading to an unsolvable outcome.

Related questions

What happens when an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object?

This scenario presents a logical paradox because if the force is truly unstoppable, then it should be able to move any object regardless of its immovability. However, if the object is truly unmovable, then no force, not even an unstoppable one, should be able to move it. This dilemma illustrates the limitations of our understanding of physics and the concept of infinity.


What happens when an unstopabul force meat an emovebal object?

This scenario sets up a paradox because an unstoppable force cannot be slowed or stopped by any means, while an immovable object cannot be moved or affected by any force. If they were to meet, it would result in a logical contradiction. It is considered a thought experiment with no real-world solution.


What happens when an unstopable object meets an unmovable object and they collide together?

This scenario presents a paradox, as an unstoppable object would not be able to be stopped by any force, while an immovable object cannot be moved by any force. In reality, such objects cannot coexist within the same universe.


What happens when the strongest force in the universe hits a unmovable object with all its power?

The strong force will hit the object and may or may notmove it depending on what the 2 objects are. An example would be if the strongest force was the sun and the unmovable object was the earth then the planet would burn up and we would all DIE.


What would happen if an immovable object got hit by an unstoppable force?

If the unstoppable object was smaller, then it would pierce a hole through the immovable object, not moving the object, and not stopping.


What would win an unstoppable force or an undestroyable object?

they would both lose.


What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?

This classic paradox poses a hypothetical scenario where contradictory conditions exist. If an irresistible force exists, it should be able to overcome any resistance, but if an immovable object exists, it cannot be moved by any force. In reality, it is impossible for both concepts to coexist, as their definitions would cancel each other out.


What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?

It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.


Who would win-an immovable object or an unstoppable force?

This is a classic paradoxical question. If the object is truly immovable, then the force cannot move it. Similarly, if the force is truly unstoppable, then the object cannot prevent it from moving. It's a situation where both possibilities contradict each other, leading to an unsolvable outcome.


What would happen if an unstoppable object collided with an immobile object?

the particles would split tocreate multiple unstoppable objects


How do you stop an unstoppable force?

One possible approach is to redirect its energy or find a way to absorb or negate its impact. Alternatively, create an equal and opposite force to counteract it, or find its source and address the root cause. Ultimately, it may be necessary to adapt and evolve to coexist with the force rather than trying to stop it completely.


What happens if an unstoppable force hits an unmoveable object?

This scenario presents a paradox as an unstoppable force by definition cannot exist alongside an immovable object. The collision of such theoretical entities would result in a logical contradiction, as the existence of one would negate the possibility of the other. In physics, it is not possible for both to coexist simultaneously in a real-world scenario.