Tags Nuclear Energy

Animals & Plants Arts & Entertainment Auto Beauty & Health Books and Literature Business Electronics Engineering & Technology Food & Drink History Hobbies Jobs & Education Law & Government Math People & Society Science Social Studies Sports Travel & Places

0

What would be the source of fuel required by a fusion reactor?

Anonymous

∙ 13y ago

Updated: 8/17/2019

Deutrium and tritium are needed as fuel in fusion reactor.

Wiki User

∙ 15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

Lao

The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.

Chat with Lao

Fran

I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.

Chat with Fran

Vivi

Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.

Chat with Vivi

More answers

Tritium and deuterium

Wiki User

∙ 13y ago

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts

Q: What would be the source of fuel required by a fusion reactor?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

imp

Trending Questions

What is constant weight hydrometer? Comaparison of edsa 1 and edsa 2? Did the Maori hunt for whales? What does DOOP stand for? What is the moral lesson in the Jesus and the adulterous woman? Does UNLV have trimester or semester? 6 D of S? What are the release dates for Made in America - 2003 Hallmark Cards 2-11? Do ladybugs have ears? How much time is 10 Hz? What is spoils in mining? What is 8750 divided by 12? What is casino gambling? Why use capictor in motor? Is passengers a proper noun? When they will finish the Disneyland in Qatar? Is pat benatar in the rock and roll hall of fame? Which online multiplayer game does Penny become addicted to? How much does it cost to hire a country music star? What is the slope of the line perpendicular to y5?

Related Questions

How a fusion reactor would be similar to a fission reactor?

explain how a fusion reactor would be similar to a fission reaction

Why would a fusion reactor that needs more energy than it produces not be much use?

A fusion reactor that needs more energy than it produces would not be economically viable or practical for power generation. The purpose of building a fusion reactor is to generate more energy than it consumes, in order to provide a sustainable and efficient source of power. If it cannot achieve this goal, it defeats the purpose of investing in fusion energy technology.

What is the importance of a fusion reactor?

A fusion reactor has the potential to provide a virtually limitless source of clean energy by harnessing the same process that powers the sun. It could help reduce dependence on fossil fuels and mitigate climate change by providing a sustainable alternative energy source. Additionally, fusion reactors produce minimal radioactive waste compared to nuclear fission reactors.

How would a fusion reactor differ from the nuclear reactor?

A fusion reactor generates energy by fusing atomic nuclei together, replicating the process that powers the sun, while a nuclear reactor generates energy through nuclear fission, which involves splitting atomic nuclei. Fusion reactors have the potential for greater energy output, produce less radioactive waste, and have lower risk of meltdown compared to nuclear reactors. However, fusion reactors are still in the experimental stage and face challenges in achieving sustained fusion reactions at a commercial scale.

What are the technical problems related to nuclear fusion?

Nuclear fusion requires very high temperatures and immense pressures to start and continue. The problems with a nuclear fusion reactor would be:- 1) the high temperatures would melt the container: therefore, the reaction would have to be stored in a vacuum suspended by a magnetic field and the reactor would have to be continually cooled. 2) nuclear fusion occurs naturally in stars such as our sun: unless the fusion reaction was limited in size in some way, it would be likely that our planet is vapourised by the reaction.

What happens in a fusion reactor if the plasma touched the sides of the container?

If the plasma in a fusion reactor touches the sides of the container, it can cause damage to the walls due to high temperatures and erosion. It can also lead to contamination of the plasma by materials from the wall, affecting the fusion reaction. Maintaining a safe distance between the plasma and the container walls is crucial for the efficient operation of the fusion reactor.

Why would a fusion reactor produce less radioactive waste than a fission reactor?

In my understanding, this is because a fusion reactor reacts deuterium to produce helium, which is not radioactive, whereas a fission uses uranium or plutonium, for example, which may react to form various radioactive isotopes. A fusion reactor may contain small quantities of tritium, in which case a radioactive isotope of hydrogen may be produced, but given that the majority of reactions occurring involve solely the deuterium, there is less radioactive waste produced.

How could sea water be used as a source of hydrogen for nuclear fusion?

Electrolysis in an enrichment cascade to make heavy water then separate the deuterium from the oxygen. This plant would be powered from some of the electricity made by the fusion reactor. It would effectively manufacture its own fuel. Waste ordinary hydrogen could be liquified for use as fuel in hydrogen fuel cell powered cars.

What is the major problem with fusion reactions as an energy source?

Problem on nuclear fusion is upon confinement of reaction in earth atmosphere. Nuclear fusion required very high temperature to initiate the reaction. Sustaining reaction is not easy. It is likely the earliest nuclear fusion will be available commercially by 2050. It is a little far future for the current energy crisis would reach it peak around 2040.

Can you use tritium water as moderator in nuclear reactor?

Yes, tritium water can be used as a moderator in a nuclear reactor. However, tritium itself is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, so careful handling and safety measures are required due to its potential health risks. Research is being conducted on the use of tritium in nuclear fusion reactors, but it is not commonly used as a moderator in fission reactors.

Could a fusion reactor be used as a time machine?

Could a fusion reactor be used as a time machine?Hmmm... We don't know. At least us mere mortals don't know - yet. There may be some physicists that know, but they are not talking.Certainly, there is tremendous energy available in a fusion reaction, possibly even enough to accelerate an object to near relativistic speed and make the Lorentz transformations take effect, but I would wonder how "squashed" that object would be.For now, lets settle on "no, a fusion reactor can not be used as a time machine".Followup:That answer was somewhat tongue in cheek, because the Lorentz transformations can only dilate or contract time, they cannot, to the best of our knowledge, change time. The answer remains, "no".

If a fusion reactors plasma is hotter than the core of the sun would it not burn up the reactor and possably the atmosphere if the magnets were to fail?

Unfortunatly, it would If you found this helpful please click trust below

Still have questions?

imp

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company

Copyright ©2025 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.