In their society, the Romans chose not to have a monarchy as their form of government. Kings were taboo to their way of thinking due to the oppressiveness of their last ruling king.
An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
swords, axes, catapults, archers, trebuchets, box shields, and lances, though ther are others. By the way u spelled weapons wrong.
In their society, the Romans chose not to have a monarchy as their form of government. Kings were taboo to their way of thinking due to the oppressiveness of their last ruling king.
An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.
Julius Ceasar, in a way. He was made Dictator for Life. After his death his great nephew Octavian became the first genuine Roman emperor given the title Augustus.
Because Spartcus and his followers had humiliated the Empire, and the Emperor needed to show he was in charge by killing the rebels in a obvious way.
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
Rome persecuted people of faith until the Romans realized that what they had been doing was immoral and wrong.
The Emperors power was limited because if the king chose a good bishop he would be knowned in a good way nope
swords, axes, catapults, archers, trebuchets, box shields, and lances, though ther are others. By the way u spelled weapons wrong.
swords, axes, catapults, archers, trebuchets, box shields, and lances, though ther are others. By the way u spelled weapons wrong.
Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.
The Romans did not have fashion. They were traditional in the way they dressed.