Hadrian's Wall was 80 Roman miles (73.5 English miles or 117 kilometres) long, its width and height dependent on the construction materials which were available nearby: east of River Irthing the wall was made from squared stone and measured 3 metres (9.7 ft) wide and 5 to 6 metres (16-20 ft) tall; west of the river the wall was made from turf and measured 6 metres (20 ft) wide and 3.5 metres (11.5 ft) high. This does not include the wall's ditches, berms, and forts. The central section measured 8 Roman feet wide (7.8 ft or 2.4 m) on a 10 foot base. Some parts of this section of the wall survive to a height of 10 feet. source: Wikipedia
no. It's in northumbria
about 500 to 1000 soldiers
The Romans and the Celts fought in Hadrians Wall.
Hadrians wall marks the furthest extent of the Roman conquest of britain(not counting the antonine wall)
Hadrians wall
Hadrians wall is in Rome and It was built by the sevants of King Hadrian. And they found timber by it.
It was the least important wall
The Amazon River is much longer. Hadrians Wall, in England, is much shorter.
hadrians wall
no. It's in northumbria
because the Hadrian's wall is crumbled
Now Hadrian's wall is British, but originally it was Roman.
there was 16 forts.
about 500 to 1000 soldiers
None. It is not a brick wall. It was constructed of stone and turf.
The Romans and the Celts fought in Hadrians Wall.
Stone and composite bricks.