The opposite of red shift is blue shift. Blue shift occurs when an object is moving towards an observer, causing a shift of light towards the blue end of the spectrum due to Doppler effect.
The redshift of galaxies is evidence for the Big Bang theory because it shows that the universe is expanding. When light from distant galaxies is redshifted, it means that those galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is getting larger and supporting the idea that everything originated from a single point in a massive explosion.
The Doppler effect observed in the light from distant galaxies showed that they are moving away from us. This led to the realization that the universe is expanding, supporting the Big Bang theory that posits the universe originated from a hot and dense state and has been expanding ever since.
This phenomenon is called red shift.
No
Red shift does not support the steady state theory.
Red shift does not support the steady state theory. The red shift of distant galaxies suggests that the universe is expanding, which contradicts the steady state theory that posits a constant, unchanging universe. The red shift is consistent with the Big Bang theory, which states that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since.
Red shift caused by the galaxies moving apart.
The model of universe creation supported by the red shift is the Big Bang theory. Red shift is the observation that galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is expanding. This expansion suggests that the universe originated from a hot, dense state, which is a key aspect of the Big Bang theory.
It isn't clear what forms of evidence you are talking about. Also, redshift is not a theory; it's an observational fact. The THEORY (actually, the only reasonable explanation) for redshift on large scales is that it is due to the expansion of the Universe.
Red shift is the observation that light from distant galaxies is shifted towards longer wavelengths, indicating that these galaxies are moving away from us. The expansion of the universe, as predicted by the Big Bang theory, explains this red shift as the result of the universe stretching and galaxies moving apart. The amount of red shift seen in the light from galaxies is consistent with the idea that the universe began as a hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
Outside of our Local Group, no galaxy gives off light that exhibits a blue-shift. You most likely meant to say "red shift."
Jesuit priest George LeMaitre first proposed the idea that the space of our Universe is expanding, and has been doing so since (his words) "the day with no yesterday." If his idea is correct, then we would see all galaxies outside our Local Group as red shifted, and the size of that red shift would be proportional to the distance between us and those distant galaxies. This undeniable fact about our Universe -- called the Cosmological (or Hubble) Red Shift -- is exactly what we do see.
No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.
massive energy created matterTo get to the theory ... the red shift (and Hubble).If you're referring to how the big bang began, science has no answer.
Other evidence supporting the Big Bang theory includes the cosmic microwave background radiation, the abundance of light elements in the universe, and the large-scale structure and distribution of galaxies in the universe. Additionally, observations of the universe's expansion and the Hubble law provide further support for the Big Bang theory.