Without getting into all the math, the engineering strain utilizes the initial length of the specimen in the calculation, the true strain utilizes the instantaneous length of the specimen.
Getting into the math:
strain engineering = change in L / original L
true strain = ln(1+strain engineering)
Engineering strain is the change in length divided by the original length, so that a 1 inch part strained 50% or .5 in/in would become 1.5 in or if strained -50% or -.5 in/in would become .5 inches. But these two strains are not the same amount of deformation since as a material is stretched further the change in length is distributed over a longer length for positive values and over a smaller length for larger values. Consider progressing from the now 1.5 in. (50%) strained part and continuing to 100% and the .5 in. (-50%) strained part and continuing to -100%. The next change in length is distributed over 1.5 in. and .5 inches respectively despite this the equation considers this change relative to the same original length of 1 inch. True strain is the change in length divided by the instantaneous length integrated from the original length to the instantaneous length. This resolves to the equation above.
Short answer:strain engineering = change in L / original Ltrue strain = ln(1+strain engineering)Engineering strain is the change in length divided by the original length, so that a 1 inch part strained 50% or .5 in/in would become 1.5 in or if strained -50% or -.5 in/in would become .5 inches. But these two strains are not the same amount of deformation since as a material is stretched further the change in length is distributed over a longer length for positive values and over a smaller length for larger values. Consider progressing from the now 1.5 in. (50%) strained part and continuing to 100% and the .5 in. (-50%) strained part and continuing to -100%. The next change in length is distributed over 1.5 in. and .5 inches respectively despite this the equation considers this change relative to the same original length of 1 inch. True strain is the change in length divided by the instantaneous length integrated from the original length to the instantaneous length. This resolves to the equation above.Engineering Stress is more of an approximation. As stress levels increase, the actual cross sectional area of the object will change due to the force (think of a rubber band getting thinner as it gets stretched out).Since stress is force divided by area the stress changes as a product of two variables. If you think of it that way, you are thinking of true stress.Engineering stress holds the cross sectional area constant at its original value.So if you look at a stress strain diagram, engineering stress levels off at the ultimate strength but true stress continues to climb because it is being divided by a smaller and smaller number as the object is stretched to the point of failure.
3D Image Correlation provides full 3D coordinates of the surface of the material in test, using two camera stereoscopic view, which provides true deformation and strain data. 2D image correlation, uses one camera, providing relative displacement and strain data. As long as strain is greater than 1% and a longer lens is used, 2D can work well. 3D is much safer and more accurate.
hi dear, yes its true that stress increases after lower yield for ductile material. it happens due to reason of strain hardening. strain hardening is the property of the material with which the grain structures presents in the body forms bond between them. so in order to break that bonds, the stress increases after lower yield point..
Mechanical engineers need to be:adaptablecreativepracticalpatient and persistentaccurate, with an eye for detailable to work well under pressureable to work well independently and in a team.your answer here...
the radial variation of a true circle. the radial variation of a true circle. the radial variation of a true circle. the radial variation of a true circle.
I'm assuming you mean the difference between true stress and engineering stress: Engineering stress is only accounting for the area given at the time before deformation. True stress accounts for the change in area that occurs as the material is stressed. If you stay in the elastic region, there will be almost no difference between the two.
see the following questionWhat_the_difference_between_true_strain_and_engineering_strain
One difference between Herkimwe diamonds and true diamonds is that the Herkimwe diamonds are softer than true diamonds.
A story can be true or not where as a tale is not true.
True means that it is correct. False means it is not true.
True. Declination is the angular difference between true north (the direction of the North Pole) and magnetic north (the direction a compass points towards).
The Banker's Gain (BG) is the difference between a banker's discount and a true discount. It is a deduction with simple interest.
Dear friends,I hereby is trying to solve your problem.Diff b/w CS and IT in engineering:The Computer Science engineering is something which contains the specialization in particular computer field and the IT engineering is which contains all the technologies.Ya it is true that now a days in most of the technologies computer science is essential but if we sharply notice at the difference then-"A computer science engineer develops the logic but an IT engineer implements it into different equipments and that is the difference which CS and IT engineering have respectively."- Tomar
The difference between true stress & engineering stress is summarised as follows: Engineering stress assumes that the area a force is acting upon remains constant, true stress takes into account the variation in the cross sectional area as a result of the stress induced deformation (strain) of a material. For example a steel bar in tension once its yield point or stress is reached will start to "neck". Necking is the localized concentration of strain in a small region of the material, causing a reduction in cross sectional area at this point. To calculate the engineering stress in the above case, the applied load is divided by the original cross sectional area, however the true stress would be equal to the load divided by the new deformed cross sectional area. Therefore true stress is likely to be significantly higher than engineering stress. Note that while the material is deforming elastically before the yield point is reached there will be some difference between true and engineering stress (as the material is changing shape) but it will be much smaller than the difference after the yield point is reached. A rock core in a uni-axial compression test will typically expand radially under loading. Therefore in this case, the engineering stress (based on the original diameter) will be larger than the true stress within the material.
Knowledge is true, and belief is something that is claimed to be true.
True means correct, factual. False is the opposite - it means not true or not correct.
No, it is fiction.