I also got 137 as my IQ and I'm 14 years old so yes its a very high IQ and yes its very good for a 16 year old. IQ's given by professional are usually given as a percentile rank. A 137 IQ is very high, anyone who says it's not is crazy. If your IQ is 115, you are better then about 65-70% of all people, which is good when you think about it.
Attaining a score of 137 on a legitimate (psychologist-supervised) test (e.g. Stanford-Binet) with a standard deviation of 16 ranks one at the 99th percentile, objectively, assuming a mean score of 100. In reality, global mean IQ is ostensibly ~90 (SD16; 88, SD15); thusly, an SD16 score of 137 (SD15, 135) places one at approximately the 99.9th percentile amongst all people, worldwide. An individual scoring 137 (SD16) is eligible for admission to Intertel (and, of course, Mensa, given Mensa's lesser requirement of 132).
i don't think that 136 is good because i had a 137 and i am 10 in fifth grade i am just saying. ~ Imature fifth grader with no knowledge with IQ should not be answering questions on Answers.com If you have taken a IQ test that's NOT from the internet, and scored above 130, I'd say well done.
20% of 137= 20% * 137= 0.2 * 137= 27.4
137 = 137/1 in fraction
I also got 137 as my IQ and I'm 14 years old so yes its a very high IQ and yes its very good for a 16 year old. IQ's given by professional are usually given as a percentile rank. A 137 IQ is very high, anyone who says it's not is crazy. If your IQ is 115, you are better then about 65-70% of all people, which is good when you think about it.
to me i would think it would be pretty high for a movie star like herself
The average IQ of an Ivy League student is 137. This has increased since the 1960's when the average Ivy League IQ was 117.
It's 137 shes pretty smart
Great IQ! It is 2 standard deviations above average and places that IQ in the top 2 percent of the world's population. assuming accurate and comprehensive testing by a certified cognitive psychologist. Internet IQ tests have zero value. Knowledge and wisdom beats IQ about ten to one.
That is outstanding. A person with an IQ of 145 is considered to be about 45% more intelligent than an average individual of the same age.
100 is the average IQ more is above average, less is below. However, because people have become more educated and are, in general, smarter than in the past, the average keeps moving upwards. An IQ that was above average forty years ago, might equate to slightly below average today. As far a a current score goes, 137 is well above average.
Attaining a score of 137 on a legitimate (psychologist-supervised) test (e.g. Stanford-Binet) with a standard deviation of 16 ranks one at the 99th percentile, objectively, assuming a mean score of 100. In reality, global mean IQ is ostensibly ~90 (SD16; 88, SD15); thusly, an SD16 score of 137 (SD15, 135) places one at approximately the 99.9th percentile amongst all people, worldwide. An individual scoring 137 (SD16) is eligible for admission to Intertel (and, of course, Mensa, given Mensa's lesser requirement of 132).
There is a site that accepts an Army pre-1980 GT score of 136 as evidence for an IQ in the top 2% of IQ,starting at 130 or higher. My 1962 GT was 140; IF the factor 136/130 is valid, a divisor of 1.046+... applied to 140 yields 133.823, a ridiculous accuracy, but there it is. A a pre-1980 GT of 137 would be (another ridiculous accuracy) and yield an IQ of 130.95588. Hurray.
i don't think that 136 is good because i had a 137 and i am 10 in fifth grade i am just saying. ~ Imature fifth grader with no knowledge with IQ should not be answering questions on Answers.com If you have taken a IQ test that's NOT from the internet, and scored above 130, I'd say well done.
A score of 127 on an IQ test is considered above average, falling within the top 15% of the population. This score suggests that the individual has strong cognitive abilities compared to their peers.
According to the well known hoax Clinton's IQ was cited as 182. However this is clearly a gross exaggeration and his IQ has been reported to be 137. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are two different I.Q. scales, what could be called the "baby scale" and a much more "rigorous" one. The rigorous one has even Einstein as "low" as 160. The other scale has him at, say, 225 or so. I would imagine that the 180 I.Q. for Bill Clinton is from the "baby" scale, while the 137 score is from the much more rigorous scale. From that point of view, with a 137 I.Q. score, on that scale Bill Clinton's I.Q. is MUCH higher than the average of the "general population." With a 180 I.Q. score on the other scale, it means that (as a general rule of thumb) he would have been cognitively ready to start taking college-level courses, full-time, at the age of ten. 110 according to http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/Famous-SAT-Scores.html