This is because they didn't have enough crusaders.
Anna Comnena thought highly of the civilized crusaders fighting for God, but greatly disliked the dirty and wreck-less crusaders. She speaks about their imposing on her empire and being so brutal for no reason. Pretty much she respected the true crusaders, but didn't like the brutal ones going on crusades for money and power.
one third
Cause hes stupid
In the Middle Ages, the Crusaders used three principal methods of fighting. The first and most prominent was the charge by horse-borne knights, whether individually or in formation. As common was the direct advance by foot-soldiers bearing bladed weapons or blunt weapons (such as clubs). Increasingly common as years passed was the use of bowed weapons, with the European crossbow coming to be especially feared by their Arabic opponents in the Middle East.
Jerusalem was the destination of the first two crusaders.
Knights came first.
They won the first crusade.
yes they did succeed
The crusaders won the first one but then Saladin called a Jihad onto the crusaders and captured Jerusalem. After that the christians tried to reclaim it but failed almost everytime and when they failed they tried again, and again.
Jerusalem was the destination of the first two crusaders.
Colin Slade
The Christians took Jerusalem from Muslim control.
because they all were on your mother
The year 1099
The First Crusade could be said that it was a victory of sorts for the Crusaders.
crusaders took too much equipment.