answersLogoWhite

0

This asks for an opinion and as such you may have multiple opinions:

Answer 1

There is no group of people of which I am aware that believe that war and revolution should be constant or quasi-constant aspects of life. However, the debate centers on whether there are instances when the best way to improve a situation or the only way to improve a situation is through violent actions such as war or revolution. I hold that it does.

The foremost case in which war is necessary is the case of defensive war. If a belligerent force or nation attacks and you do nothing you forfeit your rights to live in peace and to be able to have a voice in your own life. There are pacifist groups which literally sat still while their lands were stolen from them and their people were enslaved. People have a right to live in peace and that right should be defended against those who would wish otherwise.

The next most common case is government intransigence. Historically, a number of governments have been unwilling to listen to the needs of their people and put them in dangerous and problematic situations. As a result, people have needed to catch the ear of government. If the government will not permit peaceful protests, sometime violent revolution is necessary to change the government.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is war and revolution necessary
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp