The Supreme Court has the unwritten policy of judicial review. This means that they can check amendments and bills that the other two branches of the federal government suggest. If a law seems to be unconstitutional, and not written in the constitution, the Supreme Court can decide it is unconstitutional.
In USA the Supreme court judges decide as to whether certain laws are constitutional or not. eg.In the Brown vs Board of education of TOPEKA 1954 case the supreme court ruled that the " separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional
The Judicial branch has the power to interpret the laws, or decide if they are unconstitutional. The checks on the Judicial branch are the power of the executive branch to enforce the laws and the power of the legislative branch to make laws.
Unconstitutional
Judges decide questions of law. Juries decide issues of fact.
No. The Supreme Court has the ability to declare something unconstitutional or not. If they have declared something unconstitutional then there is nothing the president can do about it.
Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that says that judges should hesitate to strike down a law unless it is obviously unconstitutional. This encourages judges to limit their own powers.
The delegates at the Annapolis Convention declared slavery to be unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional
Unconstitutional
They can strike down any law they see as unconstitutional if it is challenged in court.
Precedent cases are those whose principles are used by judges to decide current cases. Judges rely on the decisions and reasoning of prior cases to guide their judgment in similar situations.
No