Julius Caesar's rule lasted for only five years. He gained power by fighting a civil war against the senate which took place in Greece, Egypt, Tunisia and Spain. The main impact of Caesar's rule outside Italy was that he ended the practice of "tax farming." Taxation in the provinces had been tendered to private individuals who collected taxes on an extortionate manner. Caesar restored an earlier system which allowed the cities in the provinces to collect the taxes themselves. This reduced resentment in the provinces and made Roman rule and influence more acceptable.
Prior to his rise to power, Caesar conquered Gaul (France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Holland south of the river Rhine, and Germany west of the Rhine) in his Gallic Wars (58-50 BC). This led to the extension of Roman influence into this area.
The assassination of Julius Caesar led to further civil wars. Augustus emerged as the final victor of these wars, became an absolute ruler and the first Roman emperor. He started the period of rule by emperors. He ended the disarray the Late Roman Republic had descended into and restored stability in the empire by attaining control of Rome' Politics and Government and the provinces. Roman influence changed through the economic changes in the empire promoted by Augustus and through his further expansion of the empire.
Augustus promoted trade. He favoured private enterprise and production of agricultural goods and manufactures for trade. He ensured that the taxation system was not unfavourable to entrepreneurs. He also promoted the development of infrastructure which facilitated the development of trade: the construction of roads, bridges, ports and aqueducts. The relative political stability and Augustus' policies led to the development of thriving trading networks throughout the Roman Empire. This led to greater prosperity in the provinces and greater economic, political and cultural integration of the conquered peoples into the Roman Empire and greater Roman influence. He also promoted an imperial ideology which justified rule by emperors and encouraged greater cultural homogeneity among the various peoples of the empire.
Augustus also expanded the Roman Empire. He annexed Egypt. He also annexed former Roman client states: Judea, Galatia (in Turkey) and the lower Danube area south of his river (Moesia). He completed the conquest of Spain and conquered the Rhaetia and Noricum in the Alpine region and the plain of Pannonia (western Hungary and eastern Austria). Therefore, Augustus expanded the area of Roman influence.
Julius Caesar and his adoptive son, Augustus.
Gaius Octavius, changes his name to Augustus Caesar when he came to be the Emperor of Rome. He did it as a power symbol: the name "Augustus" is Latin (Roman Language) for Great. Basically he thought "a new title, new name..."
Rulers like Ashoka, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, and Augustus Caesar significantly transformed their societies through military conquests, administrative reforms, and cultural integration. Ashoka promoted Buddhism and ethical governance, fostering peace and social welfare in India. Alexander spread Hellenistic culture across the regions he conquered, blending Greek and local customs. Meanwhile, both Julius and Augustus Caesar implemented political reforms and centralized power in Rome, leading to the expansion of the Roman Empire and the establishment of a lasting legacy in governance and law.
Julius Caesar
Augustus was respectful of the senate despite his power because he was much smarter politically than his uncle/father Julius. He learned from Caesar's assassination, which was caused by Caesar's ignoring the senate and actually insulting it. He also knew that his form a government was a change and change came slowly to the old men of the senate. One of his sayings was "make haste slowly".
July for Julius Caesar august for Augustus Caesar it was also called the Julian calendar after Julius Caesar Only one month is named after a Roman emperor and that is the month of August. The other months were/are named after gods or numerals. July was named after a Roman, Julius Caesar, but he was not an emperor and the month was only named for him after he had been declared a god.
The month of July is named after Julius Caesar and August is named after Caesar Augustus. They both changed the months and the amounts of days in them, giving us the calendar that our modern ones are based on.
Octavius was born Gaius Ocatvius Thurinus, changed name to Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus after being adopted by his uncle Julius Caesar and then changed his name to Augustus after becoming emperor of Rome.
Caesar Augustus had a long list of accomplishments. Here are some of them. He rebuilt the infrastructure of the city of Rome. He also rebuilt or refaced the public buildings. He fixed up 82 temples alone. He stabilized the borders and made the Roman army into a national army for the first time. He brought about a period of peace and prosperity for the empire which was known as the Pax Romana. However perhaps the greatest accomplishment of Augustus was the change in government which he engineered.
No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.
Both Barack Obama and Caesar Augustus are notable figures in history who rose to prominence during times of significant change. They each implemented transformative policies that reshaped their respective nations—Obama with healthcare reform and Augustus with the establishment of the Roman Empire. Additionally, both leaders were skilled orators who effectively communicated their visions to the public, fostering a sense of hope and unity. Lastly, each faced considerable challenges and opposition during their leadership, yet managed to leave a lasting legacy.
The Romans did not choose to have an emperor rather than a republic. The change in political system was the result of the Roman Republic coming to an end as a result of the civil wars which tore it, and Rome, apart. Augustus emerged as the final Victor of these wars. He gained control of the Roman legions and accumulated a massive wealth through the spoils of war. Augustus used his military power and his wealth to establish his own absolute personal rule and became the first Roman emperor. The Romans acquiesced with this because they were left exhausted by the wars, there was a power vacuum which Augustus filled and because he was the adoptive son of Caesar. The people wanted a strong government which could restore stability and hoped that Augustus would continue Caesar's reforms in favour of the poor.