0
John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster were senators in the 1800s who represented South Carolina and Massachusetts, respectively. Around this time was the civil war and slavery. Calhoun believed in expansionism, and was pro-slavery in the interest of southern economics, wanting power in the state to be strongest. Webster focused on northern interests, and saw value in the federal government's power growing.
while calhoun believed that states should have greater power than federal power, webster thought that the United States should stay as one nation--not a pact among independent states. he also thought that the welfare of the nation should override the individuals states'
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do people from other countries view the US?
People's views on the U.S. from other countries differ depending on what country it is and on the person. The general view of the United States is that the people are stubborn, arrogant, and crazy and that they cannot seem to stay out of others affairs.
How did president lincolns rhetoric about the war differ from Walt whitmans?
Lincoln spoke generally about the human cost of war
How did Polk's view views differ from clays in 1844 election?
In the national popular vote, Polk beat Clay by fewer than 40,000 votes, a margin of 1.4%. James G.
How did the native American view of land differ from the European?
The First Nation's People of Canada felt that no individual owned the land and that humans were all an equally of part of it. Although they demonstrated territorial claims, this was due to the fact that they felt that their ancestral spirits dwelled in these parts.Conversely, the European view was that land could be owned, bought and sold.
How did the native Americans view of land differ from the European?
The First Nation's People of Canada felt that no individual owned the land and that humans were all an equally of part of it. Although they demonstrated territorial claims, this was due to the fact that they felt that their ancestral spirits dwelled in these parts.Conversely, the European view was that land could be owned, bought and sold.
How does the modern view of atoms differ from the ancient view?
how does the modern view differ from this ancient view
How does God's view of women differ from what is found in many of the world's cultures today?
In the bible how does god 's view of woman differ from what is found in today cultures
Why does the world view Christians as cults?
i beg to differ
Give an example of how a 'business'view might differ from an 'information technology' view of an enterprise's information architectureThis question comes from Public Health informatics?
give an example of how a 'business' view might differ from an 'information technology' view of an enterprise's information architecture
How did the puritans' and the pilgrims' view the Anglican church differ?
puritan's were pilgrims
Why did the Republicans and Democrats differ in the view of tariff issues?
democrats supported it
Why did Republicans and Democrats differ in the view of the tariff issue?
democrats supported it
How did the two churches differ in their view on church-state relations?
They didn't
Why did the republicans and democrats differ in their view of the tariff issue?
democrats supported it
How dows the procedure for using the microscope differ under high power as opposed to low power?
When using a microscope under high power, you typically start by locating the specimen using the coarse adjustment knob on low power before switching to high power for a more detailed view. Under high power, you may need to use the fine adjustment knob more delicately to focus due to the increased magnification. Additionally, the field of view is smaller under high power compared to low power.
How did the Greeks and Romans differ in their view of ares?
The Greeks and Romans differ in their view of Ares in that the Greeks viewed him solely as a violent God. He is known as the God of war but had many other attributes in Roman lore.
How do functionalist and conflict views of bilingualism differ?
Functionalists view bilingualism as beneficial for individuals and society, facilitating communication and promoting cultural diversity. Conflict theorists view bilingualism as a source of inequality and segregation, where power dynamics determine which languages are promoted and valued in society.
