Yes, kangaroos are marsupials. They are characterised by having very undeveloped young which continue their development in the mother's pouch. Like other marsupials, female kangaroos have two vaginas, or what are called paired lateral vaginae. These are for the purpose of transporting the sperm to the womb, but there is a midline pseudovaginal canal for actually giving birth. As well as two vaginas and two uteruses, female kangaroos have two fallopian tubes and two cervixes.
A marsupial.A kangaroo is a marsupial.
they belong to the marsupial group
The wallaby is, first and foremost, a mammal. Within the mammal group, it is a marsupial. Within the marsupial group, it is a macropod, which includes all species of kangaroos.
Not at all. The mongoose is a placental mammal and the kangaroo is a marsupial. The two animals are not even remotely related.
No. Rodents are placental mammals and kangaroos are marsupials. The two are not even remotely related. Confusion can arise from the fact that there are kangaroo rats, which are rodents of North America, and rat-kangaroos which are marsupials, and members of the kangaroo family in Australia.
A marsupial is a mammal.A deer is not a marsupial, which is a sub-group of the mammal classification. A deer is known as a placental mammal, or Eutherian.
The brown bear does not belong. It is a placental mammal, not a marsupial like the others in the list.
A wallaroo is a marsupial.
An ibex is not a marsupial. It is a placental mammal.
An elephant is a mammal, not a marsupial.
A mammal which is not a marsupial or a monotreme is called a placental mammal. There is no opposite to a marsupial. An animal is either a marsupial or it is not. Marsupial is the term given to any mammal of the order Marsupialia whose young are born in an immature state and continue development in the "marsupium" (or pouch).
No a kangaroo is not an ungulate mammal but it is a Marsupial mammal.Ungulates are placental mammals.