Value Engineering is a systematic method to improve the "Value" of goods and services by using an examination of
function. Value, as defined, is the ratio of Function to Cost. Value can therefore be increased by either improving the Function
or reducing the cost. It is a primary tenet of Value Engineering that basic functions be preserved and not be reduced as a
consequence of pursuing Value improvements. [1]
In the United States, Value Engineering is specifically spelled out in Public Law 104-106, which states “Each executive agency
shall establish and maintain cost-effective Value Engineering procedures and processes." [2]
Value Engineering is sometimes taught within the Project Management or
industrial engineering body of knowledge as a technique in which the value of a
system’s outputs is optimized by crafting a mix of performance (Function) and
costs. In most cases this practice identifies and removes unnecessary expenditures, thereby increasing the value for the
manufacturer and/or their customers.
Value Engineering uses rational logic (a unique "how" - "why" questioning technique) and the analysis of Function to identify
relationships that increase Value. It is considered a quantitative method similar to the Scientific Method, which focuses on
Hypothesis - Conclusion to test relationships, and Operations Research, which uses model building to identify predictive
relationships.
Value Engineering is also referred to as "Value Methodology". One should remember VE is above all a rationale
decision-making/thinking methodology, with a very specific uniqueness that of Functional thinking, understanding something so
well that it can be described in two words, a verb & a noun, i.e. the function of a pencil is Make Marks, this then becomes
an opportunity statement when considering what else can make marks? From a spray can, lipstick, a diamond on glass to a stick in
the sand, one can then clearly decide upon which alternative solution is most appropriate.
The Origins of Value Engineering
Value engineering began at General Electric Co. during World War II. Because of the war, there were shortages of skilled labour, raw materials, and component
parts. Lawrence Miles and Harry Erlicher at G.E. looked for acceptable substitutes. They noticed that these substitutions often
reduced costs, improved the product, or both. What started out as an accident of necessity was turned into a systematic process.
They called their technique “value analysis”.
As others adopted the technique, the name gradually changed to Value Engineering. VA / VE has been rehashed over the years
into various other programs like lean, TQM, TRIZ, and business process reengineering.
The Job Plan
Value Engineering is often done by systematically following a multi-stage Job Plan. Larry Miles' original system was a
six-step procedure which he called the Value Analysis Job Plan. Others have varied the Job Plan to fit their constraints.
Depending on the application, there may be four, five, six, or more stages. One modern version has the following eight steps:
- PREPARATION
- INFORMATION
- ANALYSIS
- CREATION
- EVALUATION
- DEVELOPMENT
- PRESENTATION
- FOLLOW-UP
Four basic steps in the Job Plan are:
- Information gathering - This asks what the requirements are for the object. Function analysis, an important technique in
value engineering, is usually done in this initial stage. It tries to determine what functions or performance characteristics are
important. It asks questions like; What does the object do? What must it do? What should it do? What could it do? What must it
not do?
- Alternative generation (Creation) - In this stage value engineers ask; What are the various alternative ways of meeting
requirements? What else will perform the desired function?
- Evaluation - In this stage all the alternatives are assessed by evaluating how well they meet the required functions and how
great will the cost savings be.
- Presentation - In the final stage, the best alternative will be chosen and presented to the client for final decision.
How it works
VE follows a structured thought process to evaluate options.
Gather information
1. What is being done now?
Who is doing it?
What could it do?
What must not to do?
Measure
2. How will the alternatives be measured?
What are the alternate ways of meeting requirements?
What else can perform the desired function?
Analyze
3. What must be done?
What does it Cost?
Generate
4. What else will do the job?
Evaluate
5. Which Ideas are the best?
6. Develop and Expand Ideas What are the impacts? What is the cost? What is the performance?
7. Present Ideas Sell Alternatives
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)