Three ones

The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors

Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius are considered the most outstanding among the five good emperors. Aurelian, Diocletian, Constantine I (or the Great) Theodosius I (or the Great) and Justinian I (or the Great) are considered the most outstanding emperors after the five good emperors.

Answer. It

58.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.

There were three emperors called Valentinian (I, II, III)

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

The five emperors from Nerva to Aurelius are called the "good emperors" because they were generally wise men and their reigns were mostly beneficial to the empire. Under one of them, Trajan, the empire reached its greatest extent.

Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero

Five. Two triangular ones (base and top) and three rectangular ones.

Marcus Aurelius.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.

you just need to read them (describe how many and what digits you see): 5="one five"=15, 15="one one, one five"=1115, 1115="three ones, one five"=3115... etc. so the next number would be 311311222115 (three ones, one three, one one, two twos, two ones, one five)

There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.

Five, one of them is Augustus.

Three Roman emperors.

the three emperors

The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. It is the fruit of his biased views. In fact, Machiavelli saw Titus, who reigned before his "five good emperors" as a good emperor, but ruled him out for the reason explained below. The seven emperors before the five good ones (apart for the three men who ruled shortly in the fights for power of the Year of the Four Emperors, 69 AD, which Vespasian won) were not necessarily bad. In the reign of the early emperors there was tension between the emperors, who were absolute rulers, and the senators and the aristocracy who disliked their power. Not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad. Moreover, Machiavelli (And other historians after him) tended to take the writings of (aristocratic) ancient Romans about the emperors at face value. Some emperors who were unpopular with the aristocracy were portrayed in what was most probably a slanderous way. More recently, a more critical appraisal by modern historians had put these emperors in a more favourable light.

Machiavelli mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people.

The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."

The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. Machiavelli mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people.

The term is the fruit of his biased views. In fact, Machiavelli saw Titus, who reigned before his "five good emperors" as a good emperor, but ruled him out for the reason explained below. The seven emperors before the five good ones (apart for the three men who ruled shortly in the fights for power of the Year of the Four Emperors, 69 AD, which Vespasian won) were not necessarily bad. In the reign of the early emperors there was tension between the emperors, who were absolute rulers, and the senators and the aristocracy who disliked their power. Not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad. Moreover, Machiavelli (And other historians after him) tended to take the writings of (aristocratic) ancient Romans about the emperors at face value. Some emperors who were unpopular with the aristocracy were portrayed in what was most probably a slanderous way. More recently, a more critical appraisal by modern historians had put these emperors in a more favourable light.

The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon, who endorsed Machiavelli's view, wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."

The Claudian emperors were two of the first five Roman emperors, or perhaps I should say one and a half of the first five Roman emperors. The first five emperors are referred to as the Julio-Claudian dynasty. This was because Augustus had no male heir and so adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. He was the "one" Claudian emperor. He was followed by Caligula, who was a Julian, and he, in turn was followed by Claudius who was a Claudian on his father's side and a Julian on his mother's side. So Claudius was half Claudian and half Julian. Nero, a Julian, rounded out the dynasty.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.

five ones five tens

Ones is a noun. Do you have five ones for a five dollar bill?

doof and goof and poof

Six ones and three tenths, two hundredths, five thousandths

Ancient Rome had many, good emperors. Some of them were Augustus, Tiberius (yes, Tiberius, he left the empire in excellent financial shape), Claudius, Vespasian, Trajan and Hadrian.

There was not a region of the five emperors. There was what historians have called the Year of the Five Emperors. After the emperor Commodus was assassinated, five men fought for the title on emperor and four of them were deposed. The five men were Pertinax, Didius Julianus, Pescennius Niger, Clodius Albinus and Septimius Severus. Septimius Severus was the man who managed to hold on to power and founded the Severan dynasty which lasted from 193 to 235 and had five emperors. Since all this happened within a year, it did not affect the prosperity of the empire.

There's more than 5 emperors in the Han dynasty.

Liu Bei, Cao Cao & Sun Quan were of the Three Kingdoms Period which is actually considered separate from the Han dynasty at the time it occurred. But in history books it's under the Han dynasty.

Dong Zhuo & Yuan Shao were warlords, never emperors!

caligula was assasinated

--------------------------------------

Fiji does not have emperors and such. King Ma'afu of Tonga was the only King who tried and takeover the Lau group which was part of the Fiji Islands but he was not assassinated.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.

Because it is far easier than writing 1,1,1,1 ... 503 times!

Five Dolls for an August Moon was created in 1970.

One, three, five, seven, and nine. (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9)

I would guess about five; three on top called ocelli and two regular ones.

Emperor Wilhelm I Of Germany

You need to specify which one. There were three emperors called Theodosius.

Germany, Austria-Hungry and Russia made up the Three Emperor's League.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The imperial fora were built by the emperor whose name was associated with them. Julius Caesar, Augustus and Trajan were just three emperors who built a forum.

The duration of Five Dolls for an August Moon is 1.3 hours.

Qin Dynasty is the first dynasty in China history.

The first three emperors of China needless to say, are the emperors of the Qin dynasty.

First - Qin Shi Huang (first emperor) Yin Zhen

Second - Yin Hu Hai

Third - Yin Zi Ying

There are twelve Emperors in the Qing Dynasty!

There were sixteen Roman emperors during the Pax Romana. They were the Julio/Claudians, the first three emperors in the "years of the four emperors, The Flavians and the five Good Emperors. In other words, the Pax Romana lasted from Augustus to Aurelius. Their individual names were: Augustus, Tiberius, Gaius (Caligula), Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.

No

Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius
Marcus aurelius
augustus,caesar
marcus aurelias

The last of the so-called Five Good Emperors was Marcus Aurelius.

five point three three

five dollars thirty-three cents

five and thirty-three hundredths