The Logic of Violence in Civil War was created in 2006.

It was the President decision to end the war and collapse Japans means to make war.

no

no

Sectarian violence, if left unchecked, leads to a formal declaration of war with Generals reporting to heads of state.

The use of logic in civil engineering

I think you mean civil rights movement.

There was nothing resembling a 'Civil War movement'. The South wanted to break away and form a separate nation.

It was a precursor to the Civil War. Southern slave holders saw that northern abolitionists were willing to resort to violence to end slavery. This in turn caused them to want to secede out of fear.

I believe that the name of the war was called the Civil War. The Civil War was the time when slavery in the USA was stopped and the violence and critical times were stopped for the USA's were free from the horrid times.

If it is an armed conflict, it is called a civil war. If it has not been reduced to organized violence, it could be a riot, or merely politics.

he cause the civil war

he was responsible for all the violence and destruction the war caused

he restarted the war after it had finished

False. Violence persisted on a small scale after the Civil War, but hostilities officially ceased six years earlier, in 1865.

Yes. It is regarded as the curtain-raiser, the forthcoming civil war in microcosm - the proof that the slavery debate would never be settled, except through violence.

John Brown led raids with abolionists to revlot against salvery. He was a major influnece in the Civil War time, because he used violence to tell how made he was about slavery.

John Brown was not an influence at all in the Civil War.

90% of the Rwandans was acutely affected as violence peaked in the middle of the growing season.

CHRISTOPHER CRAMER has written:

'CIVIL WAR IS NOT A STUPID THING: ACCOUNTING FOR VIOLENCE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES'

Jim Crow Laws

no

A civil war in the 1990s killed 100,000 people there, and violence continues to be a problem.

He means that we should not act uncivilized and inhumane but instead fight with knowlege and logic instead with pointless violence that harms people and instead oof attacking the unknown with fear face it wit logic and peace.

Ghana. It was the first subsaharan country to gain independence in 1957. No civil war or violence for 55 years

The Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers.

Blood diamonds fund mayhem, civil war, terrorism and other acts of violence against humans.

It demonstrated that the slavery question would never be settled except through violence.

There were many causes for the Lebanese Civil War, but the greatest was likely the attempts of the PLO and other Palestinian Militant Organizations to coopt (through violence) the Lebanese Government to gain increased support for Palestinian Refugees in the country.

Because this war was not a "civil war." A civil war is a war where 2 factions fight over and for control of 1 government or country. Atrocities always occur with these civil wars. The War Between the States was more of a revolution, where the South wanted it's own country. Very few documented attrocities occured, so vengance with violence didn't play that much a part in reconstruction.

Generally speaking, on a short term basis, the US Civil War did not decrease the racial divide in the US. After the war, the Reconstruction Era brought about increased racism and race violence. The former Confederate states fought the reconstruction plans by the use of violence. Race relations in the South remained terrible. And, in the North racism also existed.

It would depend on which civil war you are referring to.

Wars are basically of two types. If a nation goes to war against another nation, that is war in the normal sense, which we might describe as an external war. If there are factions within a nation that go to war with each other, then the nation is effectively at war with itself. That is called a civil war. (The current fighting in Syria, as I type in September of 2012, is an example of civil war.)

Congress passed several acts and amendments to try and stop violence against African Americans and white Republicans after the Civil War. These include the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. These measures aimed to protect the rights and ensure the equality of African Americans, guarantee voting rights, and provide federal oversight to protect against violence and intimidation.

Homére Plessy

Answer this question…

A civil war in the 1990s killed 100,000 people there, and violence continues to be a problem.

*The civil war *The War between the States

the war

a civil war the civil war was the north vs. south of one country

civil war

Nobody. Syria is a capitalist country. Admittedly, because of the civil war, nothing much is produced in Syria today other than violence.

In the years following the civil war, they promoted a campain of violence and intimidation through white supremacist groups

Violence associated with checkers? Um, yea. Violence = killing = blood = war

A Civil war in general is a war between one country. If you went to another country and were talking about the civil war they probably would think you were talking about their civil war. The correct term is The United States Civil War.

The Civil War

Civil War

In Civil War

Do you mean the Spanish Civil War or the American Civil War?

Yes, it actually was a civil war :P

the Mason Dixon line separated North & South in the US Civil war

Civil War

the civil war was impotant to

The Civil War (1861-1865) The Civil War was fought between the Union (north) and the Confederacy (south). The war was fought mainly about the issue of slavery. The Union eventually won and that is what makes us the United States of America today.