In a civil trial the standard is "preponderance of the evidence" as opposed to a criminal trials "beyond a reasonable doubt".

The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant was guilty of the crime.

The correct punctuation change is: "The composer had a preponderance."

just enough evidence to make it more likely that the plaintiff is correct

The preponderance of evidence of the constant harsh and abusive language directed towards Winnebago's employees were unprofessional.

The accused does not have to prove the burden of truth and preponderance in a murder trial.

Preponderance means the quality or fact of being greater in number, quantity, or importance. If 20 things showed you robbed a bank, and 1 thing said you did not, the preponderance of evidence is- you're a bank robber!

A Preponderance of Prawns

equivalent to "beyond a reasonable doubt"

Caca

The most common context is in the setting of a civil lawsuit. A majority of the evidence must point to the defendant being the cause of whatever loss the plaintiff is claiming. Thus: "The defendant must be proved liable by a preponderance of evidence."

The constant harsh and abusive language directed towards the Winnebago employees was unprofessional, and was preponderance.

A 'Preponderance of the Evidence.'

It means a superiority in evidence over that presented by the opposition.

Preponderance means excess or more than required. For example: In a court room, the judge might say: The preponderance of evidence indicates that the defendant is guilty of murder in the first degree.

The EEO officer

preponderance of evidence

The PREPONDERANCE of the evidence

A civil case must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence.

It is a medium-grade metamorphic rock with a preponderance of the platy mineral graphite.

Yes, in civil proceedings guilt can be established by a "preponderance of the evidence," as opposed to criminal trials where guilt must be established "BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT."

It means to be greater in weight, force or influence. For example the preponderance of right handed people

There is no such word. You probably mean preponderance, which is a noun meaning superiority in strength, numbers, weight, or importance.

no change needed

It affects males and females equally, and shows no preponderance in any particular ethnic group or race.

Weight over and above what is required by law or custom., Superabundance of weight; preponderance., Overweighing; excessive.

a lot of places

Beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal and preponderance of the evidence for civil.

No. "Proof by a preponderance of the evidence" (meaning: my argument can beat up your argument) is the standard for most civil trials. "Proof beyond a resonable doubt" (meaning: unless UFOs are real we gotcha) is the standard for most criminal trials.

Weight over and above what is required by law or custom., Superabundance of weight; preponderance., Overweighing; excessive.

The prosecutor must show a preponderance of evidence that the consent was voluntary.

They live in both, but a preponderance live in apartments.

The latest research shows that 1 in about 200 people have an extra rib. The preponderance is in females.

Through a preponderance of the evidence presented to the judge

The difference is: in civil trials it is a "preponderance of evidence," whereas in a criminal trial it is "beyond a reasonable doubt."

The incidence of megalencephaly is estimated at between 2% and 6%. There is a preponderance of affected males; megalencephaly affects males three to four times more often than it does females

Preponderance of the evidence, also known as balance of probabilities is the standard required in most civil cases. The standard is met if the proposition is more likely to be true than not true. Effectively, the standard is satisfied if there is greater than 50 percent chance that the proposition is true. Lord Denning, in Miller v. Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 All ER 372, described it simply as "more probable than not."

Preponderance of evidence refers to the standard of proof required in civil cases, which means that the evidence presented must be more convincing than the evidence presented by the opposing party. It is commonly described as "more likely than not" or greater than a 50% likelihood. This standard is lower than "beyond a reasonable doubt" used in criminal cases.

Yes, in the US the legal system is based on the government having to provide credable evidence to prove beyond a preponderance of the evidence that they person charged committed the crime.

It depends on the function of the cell. For example: the muscle cells require a great deal of energy and so require many mitochondria per cell.

Criminal: beyond a reasonable doubt (very close to 100% sure)

Civil: preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not, i.e. 51% sure)

The Dept. of Child and Family Services (or whatever your state agency is called that handles custody matters) OR if a full competency hearing needs to be held, the court, will rule on this question.

In theory, you can keep the 'power' of the Executive Branch in control by overriding his 'Veto" with a vote of the Congress in such numbers that it represents "the vast preponderance of public opinion." I think its over 2/3rds.

Only criminal matters taken to jury trial require unanimity. Civil matters are determined on a much lower standard of proof, the preponderance of evidence in the opinion of the majority of the jurors.

While part of the gasses given off by the decomposition of toilet solids are methane there is a greater preponderance of carbon dioxide and other none inflammable gases. To get methane to burn it has to be cleaned.

I presume you mean 'In which direction do the rivers in Britain run?' There is possibly a preponderance from West to East, but really, rivers in Britain run every which way, and many change direction as they go.

Although not a definitive match, it could possibly in support of other evidence, the preponderance of which would tend to indicate the defendant as the perpetrator.