The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.

It is a process that involves oxygen.

The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.

No, it was not. The phenomena explained by the theory are now known to be a result of oxidation, and phlogiston does not exist.

The phlogiston theory was first proposed by Johann Joachim Becher in 1667. This theory is now considered obsolete and was replaced by the oxygen theory.

Antoine Lavoisier is credited with rejecting the phlogiston theory. Through his experiments and observations, he was able to show that combustion involved a process of oxidation rather than the release of phlogiston. This led to the development of modern chemistry.

The phlogiston theory was a scientific hypothesis that proposed that all combustible materials contain a substance called "phlogiston," which is released during combustion. According to the theory, when a substance burns, it loses phlogiston. This theory has been disproven by modern chemistry.

Yes, chemists believed in the phlogiston theory in the 17th and 18th centuries. It was thought that when substances burned, they released a substance called phlogiston. However, the theory was eventually disproven with the development of modern chemistry.

a combustible material is made up of 2 parts: the calx and phlogiston when a substance burnt the phlogiston into air and calx(ash) left behind

so there are no good points of this theory

Antoine Lavoisier disproved the phlogiston theory by experimenting with combustion reactions and showing that burning substances gained weight instead of losing it. He demonstrated that oxygen is an essential component of combustion, not phlogiston as proposed by the theory. Lavoisier's precise measurements and meticulous approach to experimental evidence played a crucial role in discrediting the phlogiston theory and establishing the foundation for modern chemistry.

The phlogiston theory, which suggested that all combustible materials contained a substance called phlogiston that was released during combustion, was once widely accepted. However, it has since been discredited with the advancement of modern chemistry and the discovery of oxygen's role in combustion. Today, the phlogiston theory is considered a historical scientific misconception.

because it changed their mind to belive that phlogiston is in flammable things.

The Phlogiston theory was unable to explain certain chemical reactions, such as the combination of metals with oxygen. It also lacked experimental support and was eventually replaced by the more accurate oxygen theory of combustion. Additionally, the concept of phlogiston was found to be vague and arbitrary.

One piece of evidence for the phlogiston theory was the observation that combustion released a substance called "phlogiston" from burning materials, leaving behind ash. Another piece of evidence was the weight gain of metals when they were heated in air, which was believed to be due to the absorption of phlogiston. However, the theory was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen and the understanding of oxidation.

The phlogiston theory was not able to give satisfactory explanations of diverse energy conversions that involved heat energy. For example, through friction you can generate an almost unlimited amount of heat energy from a device.

phlogiston, a hypothetical substance believed to be released during combustion. This theory proposed that materials burned because they released their phlogiston. The discovery of oxygen and its role in combustion led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.

Lavoisier is consider the first modern important chemist.

The phlogiston theory was created in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher. This theory is false.

The phlogiston theory was proposed by German chemist Georg Ernst Stahl in the 17th century. Stahl believed that phlogiston was a substance released during combustion.

Support for the phlogiston theory came from observing that substances such as wood and charcoal released a substance (phlogiston) when burned, leaving behind ash. This was believed to explain the weight loss during combustion. Additionally, the theory was used to account for the process of rusting in metals.

Proposed the theory of burning called the phlogiston theory

The phlogiston theory of burning is an outdated concept that suggested a substance called "phlogiston" was released during combustion. It was believed that the presence of phlogiston was necessary for materials to burn. However, this theory has been disproven with the advancement of modern chemistry, which identifies combustion as a process involving the reaction of materials with oxygen in the air.

I don' t know

Some scientists disagreed with the phlogiston theory because it could not explain all the observations, such as the weight changes in substances during combustion. Additionally, the discovery of oxygen and its role in combustion provided a more accurate explanation for the phenomena previously attributed to phlogiston.

No, Antoine Lavoisier did not agree with the phlogiston theory. Instead, he proposed the modern understanding of combustion, which involves the reaction of a substance with oxygen. His experiments led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory in favor of the oxygen theory of combustion.

No. Phlogiston was a theory considered to be fact and actually hindered scientific knowledge until it was discredited. The theory was used to explain certain observations about flame, oxidation, and the formation of certain compounds, most noticeably cinnabar. As with some theories, phlogiston used variable factors to explain anomalies. For instance it was assumed to have negative weight under certain circumstances. Once oxidation was properly understood phlogiston theory was no longer considered true.

he was the founder who found out the phlogiston theory was incorrect with Antoine lavoisier

They proposed the Phlogiston Theory.

The Pholgiston theory explains that when substances (feul) burn, people belived that pholgiston (oxygen) is produced leaving behind the Clax (ash)

Phlogiston theory was a concepts of combustion that erroneously proposed the existence of a substance called "phlogiston" which was released during the burning of materials. The theory was eventually discredited and replaced by modern understandings of combustion and oxidation in the late 18th century.

The phlogiston theory was widely held in the 17th and 18th centuries to explain combustion and oxidation. However, it was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen by Lavoisier. This discovery provided a more accurate explanation for the process of combustion.

Phlogiston can be defined as "a hypothetical substance once believed to be present in all combustible materials and to be released during burning." Chemistry was so underdeveloped at the time Antoine Lavoisier gained interest in it that it could hardly be called a science. The prevailing view of combustion was the Phlogiston Theory which involved a weightless or nearly weightless substance known as phlogiston. Metals and fire were considered to be rich in phlogiston and earth was considered phlogiston poor. The following were the main theories put forward for 'phlogiston': * Weight loss when combustibles are burned because they lose phlogiston * Fire burns out in an enclosed space because it saturates the air with phlogiston * Charcoal leaves very little residue when burned because it is made mostly of phlogiston * Animals die in an airtight space because the air becomes saturated with phlogiston * Some metal calxes turn to metals when heated with charcoal because the phlogiston from the charcoal restores the phlogiston in the metal

The element phlogiston. This was a common theory in the 17th and 18th centuries, predating the modern understanding of combustion as the rapid reaction of a material with oxygen.

The phlogiston theory was proven incorrect through experiments that showed the production of ashes when substances burned, contradicting the theory that burning releases phlogiston. Additionally, the discovery of oxygen and its role in combustion provided a more accurate explanation for the process.

The Pholgiston theory explains that when substances (feul) burn, people belived that pholgiston (oxygen) is produced leaving behind the Clax (ash)

It was noticed that when things burn, they often leave behind an ash or residue that doesn't burn. It was suggested that before it burns, a flammable object contains some substance called phlogiston, which would make it burn, and when the phlogiston is used up, what is left over would not be able to burn. This theory was later shown to be wrong, and phlogiston is no longer part of the science of chemistry.

The concept of phlogiston was unsatisfactory because it failed to explain observations in chemistry, such as the increase in weight of metals when they rusted or burned. It was eventually replaced by the theory of combustion with oxygen based on more experimental evidence.

The facts, as they stand, are these: every creature, when respiring, releases phlogiston. In fact, respiration is simply to be considered a form of combustion. Anything that can burn contains phlogiston. Substances, when burnt, release this weightless, invisible substance - an element of their being, their composition - the phlogiston. The phlogiston is always in need of somewhere to go. Such as, air is best for the phlogiston. Air can absorb it. Taking this mode of thinking to its furthest logical conclusion we can only state that the reason creatures "suffocate" is because there is nowhere for the phlogiston to go. When air was removed from around a living creature then there is nowhere for the phlogiston to go and so respiration would cease and the creature dies.

Antoine Lavoisier is credited with disproving the idea of phlogiston through his experiments on combustion and chemical reactions in the late 18th century. He showed that combustion actually involves the combining of oxygen with a substance rather than the release of phlogiston as believed earlier.

The theory of phlogiston was proposed by German chemist Johann Joachim Becher, and later developed by his student Georg Ernst Stahl in the 17th and 18th centuries.

Phlogiston was an early scientific attempt to explain what is now referred to as the generation and flow of heat. It was believed to be a fluid that existed inside objects and could flow through them (even if they were solids)).

It was replaced by the theory of thermodynamics.

The phlogiston theory proposed that everything contains an element called phlogiston which is released when something burns. It was initially challenged by the fact that things do not necessarily lose weight when burned.

It was replaced entirely by oxidation theory (which we still hold today) when it was realised that things could not burn if oxygen wasn't present.

Phlogiston was a theoretical substance proposed in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher as a key feature of his phlogiston theory. It was supposed to be released during combustion and related processes. However, the concept was eventually disproven with the development of modern chemistry.

lead calx + phlogiston = metallic lead

The phlogiston theory was accepted by many prominent scientists in the 18th century as an explanation for combustion and rusting. It was widely believed until the late 18th century when Antoine Lavoisier's experiments led to the development of the modern understanding of chemical reactions.

Antoine Lavoisier is considered to be the father of modern chemistry. He dismantled the phlogiston theory of combustion. He introduced quantitative measurement.

An antiphlogistian is a person who opposes the theory of phlogiston - the fiery principle formerly assumed to be a necessary constituent of combustible bodies and to be given up by them in burning.

The phlogiston theory was discarded by chemists a long time ago. The idea was that things burn because they contain some mysterious substance called phlogiston, and when the plogiston is used up, what is left is an ash of some sort which can no longer burn. We now know that combustion involves many different chemical reactions that different flammable chemicals have, rather than being the result of one single flammable substance that is present in everything that burns. Combustion does always involve oxygen, but oxygen can react with a great many different chemicals.

Phlogiston is a hypothetical substance which at one time was thought to be the basis of combustion, but which is now known to be fictitious. It is not an element.