answersLogoWhite

0

Search results

James H. Fetzer has written:

'Philosophy and Cognitive Science'

'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science

'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge

'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence

'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science

1 answer


Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.

1 answer


Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics.

This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician".

There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern.

Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.

2 answers


Unlike science, philosophy is not based on observable truths or known facts.

1 answer


Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp

Political science IS a philosophy. It is the study of how people form politics and policies.

1 answer


Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.

1 answer


Morality is a branch of philosophy, not science.

1 answer


"Is semantics a Philosophy or a science" is a question of concern. In order to answer it we , firstly, need to know about philosophy and science. Philosophy, in simple words, is knowledge. It is a rational investigation of truths and principles of being, knowledge or conduct. Science, on the other hand, is the emperical evidence of knowledge. These evidence, are based on experience or observation. Though observation or experience or experiment the knowledge we get is called science.

When we know know what philosophy and science are, we can nominate semantics both. Semantic is philosophy and science as well. We know that semantics is the study of meaning. It is meaning of the words and sentences as well. When we say that semantic is a philosophy, it means we know the

1 answer


Luciano Floridi has written:

'Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy'

'The need for gnoseology'

'The philosophy of information' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Information science

'Philosophy and Computing' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Computer science

1 answer


Lisa Bortolotti has written:

'An introduction to the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

1 answer


Robert A. Solo has written:

'The philosophy of science, and economics' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

1 answer


Arthur Zucker has written:

'Introduction to the Philosophy of Science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

1 answer


The difference between science and philosophy is that the science studies reality in a methodical way, while that the philosophy ponders her through reasoning and logic.

On the one hand, science wants to explain what that surrounds us, and does so through your knowledge.

1 answer


Laura J. Snyder has written:

'Reforming philosophy' -- subject(s): English Philosophy, History, Philosophy, Political science, Science

1 answer


Philosophy is not typically considered a science because it does not rely on empirical evidence or follow the scientific method. It is more concerned with abstract concepts, logic, and ethics rather than systematic observation and experimentation. However, some branches of philosophy, like philosophy of science or philosophy of mind, may intersect with scientific disciplines.

2 answers



Science and philosophy are fundamentally different in several ways:

Science, ultimately, must be testable. That is, science makes predictions that must correspond to some sort of observable and repeatable phenomenon that can be verified.

Science is objective - given the same conditions, different observers will observe the same phenomenon (although they may disagree on its interpretation).

Beyond these basics there are many similarities between philosophy and science (once known as "natural philosophy") such as self-consistency and the construction of theories.

1 answer


Lucas Carlisle Kells has written:

'Typical methods of thinking in science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Methodology, Theory (Philosophy)

1 answer


Carl Gustav Hempel has written:

'Philosophy of natural science' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science

1 answer


Ethics is a branch of philosophy, not a branch of science (although scientists can still strive to be ethical).

2 answers


Ruirong Lu has written:

'Zhongguo gu dai \\' -- subject(s): Chinese Philosophy, Military art and science, Philosophy, Philosophy, Chinese, Political science

1 answer


Mathematics, Science, and philosophy

1 answer




Miriam Ann Cunningham has written:

'Certitude and the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Truth

1 answer


Pierre Henri van Laer has written:

'Philosophy of science' -- subject- s -: Science, Philosophy

1 answer


James A. Athanus has written:

'An objectifiable correlation of philosophy and science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Ontology, Cosmology

1 answer


Hector C. Parr has written:

'Time, science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy and science, Time

1 answer


Yes, Logic is now considered a branch of Science not of Philosophy anymore. In the old days Logic is formerly a branch of Philosophy.

2 answers


Philosophy can have the luxury of emotions as is evident from the fact that poetry is a kind of philosophy. But science is not permitted to wallow in emotions. It is meant to be impartial and unemotional like mathematics.

1 answer


Herbert Feigl has written:

'Concepts Theories and the Mind-Body Problem (Studies in the Philosophy of Science Series Volume 2)'

'The 'Mental' and the 'Physical'' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science

'Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Physics

'Readings in philosophical analysis' -- subject(s): Collections, Philosophy

'Readings in the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Lending library, Philosophy, Science, Sciences, Philosophie, Wetenschapsfilosofie

'Bibliography and index' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Indexes, International encyclopedia of unified science, Philosophy, Science

'Zufall und Gesetz' -- subject(s): Causality (Physics), Causation

1 answer


A. Wolf has written:

'The philosophy of Nietzsche'

'A history of science, technology, and philosophy in the 18th century' -- subject(s): History, Science, Philosophy, Eighteenth century, Industrial arts, Technology

'Essentials of scientific method' -- subject(s): Science, Methodology

1 answer


Philosophy walks in front of science leading it and giving it a meaning.

1 answer


Jurisprudence. The philosophy of law. Also, the science and study of law.

1 answer


Naomi Zack has written:

'Women of Color and Philosophy'

'Inclusive feminism'

'American Mixed Race'

'Philosophy of science and race' -- subject(s): Race, Science, Science and civilization, Social aspects, Social aspects of Science

'Ethics for disaster' -- subject(s): Disasters, Emergency management, Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Emergency management, Risk assessment

'Bachelors of science' -- subject(s): History, Identity (Psychology), Modern Philosophy, Philosophers, Philosophy and science, Philosophy, Modern, Psychology

1 answer


Alfred Pfeiffer has written:

'Dialogues on fundamental questions of science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Cognition, Ethics, Science

1 answer


Kurt Walter Zeidler has written:

'Prolegomena zur Wissenschaftstheorie' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy and science, Philosophy

1 answer


Herbert Dingle has written:

'A century of science, 1851-1951' -- subject(s): Science, History

'Through science to philosophy' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

'Modern astrophysics ..' -- subject(s): Astrophysics, Stars

'Alfred Fowler, 1868-1940'

'Modern spectroscopy' -- subject(s): Spectrum analysis

'The sources of Eddington's philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Physics

'The scientific adventure' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, History

'Relativity for all' -- subject(s): Relativity (Physics)

1 answer



Science exists to explain natural phenomena.

1 answer


Non-science is anything not related to science or in the field of the studies of science. For example, philosophy is non-science.

1 answer


Rocco Pezzimenti has written:

'Homo metaphysicus' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Metaphysics

'The open society and it's friends' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Political science, Ancient Philosophy

1 answer


math, science and philosophy

1 answer



Philosophy is not considered a science in the traditional sense because it does not rely on empirical methods like observation and experimentation. Instead, it focuses on questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language that are often beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. It can be seen as a distinct and complementary discipline to the sciences.

2 answers


Robert G. Morrison has written:

'Islam and science' -- subject(s): Islam and science, Islamic Philosophy, Philosophy, Islamic

1 answer


Isabelle Stengers has written:

'La guerre des sciences' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Miscellanea

'Au temps des catastrophes'

'La guerre des sciences aura-t-elle lieu?' -- subject(s): Drama, Science, Philosophy

'The invention of modern science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Discoveries in science

1 answer


Thomas L. Dumm has written:

'Michel Foucault and the politics of freedom' -- subject(s): Contributions in political science, French Philosophy, Liberty, Philosophy, Philosophy, French, Political science

1 answer


Rusell likens philosophy to no man's land, the area between two trenches of two opposing factions in a war, science being one faction and theology another

He argues that philosophy is between science and theology; 'pertinent to attack from both sides'

I don't really think it's a particularly great analogy because, if anything, philosophy underpins both theology and science

this is saying that in philosophy there is no final solution. but in science 2+

2=4 that is fact and also experiment, but in philosophy it is just and assumption

1 answer


Rachel Valerie Cooper has written:

'Psychiatry and philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Philosophie, Philosophy, Psychiatrie, Psychiatry, Science, Sciences

1 answer