James H. Fetzer has written:
'Philosophy and Cognitive Science'
'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science
'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge
'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence
'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science
1 answer
Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.
1 answer
Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics.
This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician".
There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern.
Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.
2 answers
Unlike science, philosophy is not based on observable truths or known facts.
1 answer
Political science IS a philosophy. It is the study of how people form politics and policies.
1 answer
Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.
1 answer
"Is semantics a Philosophy or a science" is a question of concern. In order to answer it we , firstly, need to know about philosophy and science. Philosophy, in simple words, is knowledge. It is a rational investigation of truths and principles of being, knowledge or conduct. Science, on the other hand, is the emperical evidence of knowledge. These evidence, are based on experience or observation. Though observation or experience or experiment the knowledge we get is called science.
When we know know what philosophy and science are, we can nominate semantics both. Semantic is philosophy and science as well. We know that semantics is the study of meaning. It is meaning of the words and sentences as well. When we say that semantic is a philosophy, it means we know the
1 answer
Luciano Floridi has written:
'Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy'
'The need for gnoseology'
'The philosophy of information' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Information science
'Philosophy and Computing' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Computer science
1 answer
Lisa Bortolotti has written:
'An introduction to the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
1 answer
Robert A. Solo has written:
'The philosophy of science, and economics' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
1 answer
Arthur Zucker has written:
'Introduction to the Philosophy of Science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
1 answer
The difference between science and philosophy is that the science studies reality in a methodical way, while that the philosophy ponders her through reasoning and logic.
On the one hand, science wants to explain what that surrounds us, and does so through your knowledge.
1 answer
Laura J. Snyder has written:
'Reforming philosophy' -- subject(s): English Philosophy, History, Philosophy, Political science, Science
1 answer
Philosophy is not typically considered a science because it does not rely on empirical evidence or follow the scientific method. It is more concerned with abstract concepts, logic, and ethics rather than systematic observation and experimentation. However, some branches of philosophy, like philosophy of science or philosophy of mind, may intersect with scientific disciplines.
2 answers
Science and philosophy are fundamentally different in several ways:
Science, ultimately, must be testable. That is, science makes predictions that must correspond to some sort of observable and repeatable phenomenon that can be verified.
Science is objective - given the same conditions, different observers will observe the same phenomenon (although they may disagree on its interpretation).
Beyond these basics there are many similarities between philosophy and science (once known as "natural philosophy") such as self-consistency and the construction of theories.
1 answer
Lucas Carlisle Kells has written:
'Typical methods of thinking in science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Methodology, Theory (Philosophy)
1 answer
Carl Gustav Hempel has written:
'Philosophy of natural science' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science
1 answer
Ethics is a branch of philosophy, not a branch of science (although scientists can still strive to be ethical).
2 answers
Ruirong Lu has written:
'Zhongguo gu dai \\' -- subject(s): Chinese Philosophy, Military art and science, Philosophy, Philosophy, Chinese, Political science
1 answer
Miriam Ann Cunningham has written:
'Certitude and the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Truth
1 answer
Pierre Henri van Laer has written:
'Philosophy of science' -- subject- s -: Science, Philosophy
1 answer
James A. Athanus has written:
'An objectifiable correlation of philosophy and science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Ontology, Cosmology
1 answer
Hector C. Parr has written:
'Time, science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy and science, Time
1 answer
Yes, Logic is now considered a branch of Science not of Philosophy anymore. In the old days Logic is formerly a branch of Philosophy.
2 answers
Philosophy can have the luxury of emotions as is evident from the fact that poetry is a kind of philosophy. But science is not permitted to wallow in emotions. It is meant to be impartial and unemotional like mathematics.
1 answer
Herbert Feigl has written:
'Concepts Theories and the Mind-Body Problem (Studies in the Philosophy of Science Series Volume 2)'
'The 'Mental' and the 'Physical'' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science
'Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Physics
'Readings in philosophical analysis' -- subject(s): Collections, Philosophy
'Readings in the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Lending library, Philosophy, Science, Sciences, Philosophie, Wetenschapsfilosofie
'Bibliography and index' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Indexes, International encyclopedia of unified science, Philosophy, Science
'Zufall und Gesetz' -- subject(s): Causality (Physics), Causation
1 answer
A. Wolf has written:
'The philosophy of Nietzsche'
'A history of science, technology, and philosophy in the 18th century' -- subject(s): History, Science, Philosophy, Eighteenth century, Industrial arts, Technology
'Essentials of scientific method' -- subject(s): Science, Methodology
1 answer
Philosophy walks in front of science leading it and giving it a meaning.
1 answer
Jurisprudence. The philosophy of law. Also, the science and study of law.
1 answer
Naomi Zack has written:
'Women of Color and Philosophy'
'Inclusive feminism'
'American Mixed Race'
'Philosophy of science and race' -- subject(s): Race, Science, Science and civilization, Social aspects, Social aspects of Science
'Ethics for disaster' -- subject(s): Disasters, Emergency management, Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Emergency management, Risk assessment
'Bachelors of science' -- subject(s): History, Identity (Psychology), Modern Philosophy, Philosophers, Philosophy and science, Philosophy, Modern, Psychology
1 answer
Alfred Pfeiffer has written:
'Dialogues on fundamental questions of science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Cognition, Ethics, Science
1 answer
Kurt Walter Zeidler has written:
'Prolegomena zur Wissenschaftstheorie' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy and science, Philosophy
1 answer
Herbert Dingle has written:
'A century of science, 1851-1951' -- subject(s): Science, History
'Through science to philosophy' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
'Modern astrophysics ..' -- subject(s): Astrophysics, Stars
'Alfred Fowler, 1868-1940'
'Modern spectroscopy' -- subject(s): Spectrum analysis
'The sources of Eddington's philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Physics
'The scientific adventure' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, History
'Relativity for all' -- subject(s): Relativity (Physics)
1 answer
Metaphysics
1 answer
Science exists to explain natural phenomena.
1 answer
Non-science is anything not related to science or in the field of the studies of science. For example, philosophy is non-science.
1 answer
Rocco Pezzimenti has written:
'Homo metaphysicus' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Metaphysics
'The open society and it's friends' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Political science, Ancient Philosophy
1 answer
Philosophy is not considered a science in the traditional sense because it does not rely on empirical methods like observation and experimentation. Instead, it focuses on questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language that are often beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. It can be seen as a distinct and complementary discipline to the sciences.
2 answers
Robert G. Morrison has written:
'Islam and science' -- subject(s): Islam and science, Islamic Philosophy, Philosophy, Islamic
1 answer
Isabelle Stengers has written:
'La guerre des sciences' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Miscellanea
'Au temps des catastrophes'
'La guerre des sciences aura-t-elle lieu?' -- subject(s): Drama, Science, Philosophy
'The invention of modern science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Discoveries in science
1 answer
Thomas L. Dumm has written:
'Michel Foucault and the politics of freedom' -- subject(s): Contributions in political science, French Philosophy, Liberty, Philosophy, Philosophy, French, Political science
1 answer
Rusell likens philosophy to no man's land, the area between two trenches of two opposing factions in a war, science being one faction and theology another
He argues that philosophy is between science and theology; 'pertinent to attack from both sides'
I don't really think it's a particularly great analogy because, if anything, philosophy underpins both theology and science
this is saying that in philosophy there is no final solution. but in science 2+
2=4 that is fact and also experiment, but in philosophy it is just and assumption
1 answer
Rachel Valerie Cooper has written:
'Psychiatry and philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Philosophie, Philosophy, Psychiatrie, Psychiatry, Science, Sciences
1 answer