Luciano Floridi has written:

'Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy'

'The need for gnoseology'

'The philosophy of information' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Information science

'Philosophy and Computing' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Computer science

James H. Fetzer has written:

'Philosophy and Cognitive Science'

'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science

'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge

'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence

'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science

Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.

Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics.

This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician".

There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern.

Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.

Unlike science, philosophy is not based on observable truths or known facts.

Political science IS a philosophy. It is the study of how people form politics and policies.

Morality is a branch of philosophy, not science.

Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.

"Is semantics a Philosophy or a science" is a question of concern. In order to answer it we , firstly, need to know about philosophy and science. Philosophy, in simple words, is knowledge. It is a rational investigation of truths and principles of being, knowledge or conduct. Science, on the other hand, is the emperical evidence of knowledge. These evidence, are based on experience or observation. Though observation or experience or experiment the knowledge we get is called science.

When we know know what philosophy and science are, we can nominate semantics both. Semantic is philosophy and science as well. We know that semantics is the study of meaning. It is meaning of the words and sentences as well. When we say that semantic is a philosophy, it means we know the

Arthur Zucker has written:

'Introduction to the Philosophy of Science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

Robert A. Solo has written:

'The philosophy of science, and economics' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

Lisa Bortolotti has written:

'An introduction to the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy

The difference between science and philosophy is that the science studies reality in a methodical way, while that the philosophy ponders her through reasoning and logic.

On the one hand, science wants to explain what that surrounds us, and does so through your knowledge.

computer science

expermentation

Laura J. Snyder has written:

'Reforming philosophy' -- subject(s): English Philosophy, History, Philosophy, Political science, Science

Philosophy is not typically considered a science because it does not rely on empirical evidence or follow the scientific method. It is more concerned with abstract concepts, logic, and ethics rather than systematic observation and experimentation. However, some branches of philosophy, like philosophy of science or philosophy of mind, may intersect with scientific disciplines.

Science and philosophy are fundamentally different in several ways:

Science, ultimately, must be testable. That is, science makes predictions that must correspond to some sort of observable and repeatable phenomenon that can be verified.

Science is objective - given the same conditions, different observers will observe the same phenomenon (although they may disagree on its interpretation).

Beyond these basics there are many similarities between philosophy and science (once known as "natural philosophy") such as self-consistency and the construction of theories.

You don't get a degree with a subject; you get a degree in a subject. Bachelor of Science in Computer Science or Bachelor of Computer Science are common descriptions of this degree.

Lucas Carlisle Kells has written:

'Typical methods of thinking in science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Methodology, Theory (Philosophy)

There is no fixed answer to this. It strongly depends on your interests.

A few possibilities to consider: mathematics, computer science, economics, business law, philosophy and rhetoric, political science, physics, statistics, etc.

Ethics is a branch of philosophy, not a branch of science (although scientists can still strive to be ethical).

Carl Gustav Hempel has written:

'Philosophy of natural science' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science

bachelor of science computer sciencemaster of science computer science

Ruirong Lu has written:

'Zhongguo gu dai \\' -- subject(s): Chinese Philosophy, Military art and science, Philosophy, Philosophy, Chinese, Political science

logic philosophy

Mathematics, Science, and philosophy

Yes

Hector C. Parr has written:

'Time, science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy and science, Time

James A. Athanus has written:

'An objectifiable correlation of philosophy and science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Ontology, Cosmology

Miriam Ann Cunningham has written:

'Certitude and the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Truth

Pierre Henri van Laer has written:

'Philosophy of science' -- subject- s -: Science, Philosophy

Yes, Logic is now considered a branch of Science not of Philosophy anymore. In the old days Logic is formerly a branch of Philosophy.

Philosophy can have the luxury of emotions as is evident from the fact that poetry is a kind of philosophy. But science is not permitted to wallow in emotions. It is meant to be impartial and unemotional like mathematics.

No. Computer science is now.

Computer Science A+++

Herbert Feigl has written:

'Concepts Theories and the Mind-Body Problem (Studies in the Philosophy of Science Series Volume 2)'

'The 'Mental' and the 'Physical'' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science

'Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Physics

'Readings in philosophical analysis' -- subject(s): Collections, Philosophy

'Readings in the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Lending library, Philosophy, Science, Sciences, Philosophie, Wetenschapsfilosofie

'Bibliography and index' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Indexes, International encyclopedia of unified science, Philosophy, Science

'Zufall und Gesetz' -- subject(s): Causality (Physics), Causation

The study of computers is called computer science and Chuck Norris too.

Philosophy walks in front of science leading it and giving it a meaning.

Jurisprudence. The philosophy of law. Also, the science and study of law.

A. Wolf has written:

'The philosophy of Nietzsche'

'A history of science, technology, and philosophy in the 18th century' -- subject(s): History, Science, Philosophy, Eighteenth century, Industrial arts, Technology

'Essentials of scientific method' -- subject(s): Science, Methodology

Cognitive science is not typically considered a social science. It is an interdisciplinary field that combines elements of psychology, neuroscience, computer science, linguistics, and philosophy to study how the mind works. While cognitive science may involve studying social interactions and behaviors, it is primarily focused on understanding mental processes and cognition.

Kurt Walter Zeidler has written:

'Prolegomena zur Wissenschaftstheorie' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy and science, Philosophy

Alfred Pfeiffer has written:

'Dialogues on fundamental questions of science and philosophy' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Cognition, Ethics, Science

Yes, science can be used to evaluate philosophy by providing empirical evidence and logical reasoning to support or refute philosophical ideas.

Naomi Zack has written:

'Women of Color and Philosophy'

'Inclusive feminism'

'American Mixed Race'

'Philosophy of science and race' -- subject(s): Race, Science, Science and civilization, Social aspects, Social aspects of Science

'Ethics for disaster' -- subject(s): Disasters, Emergency management, Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Emergency management, Risk assessment

'Bachelors of science' -- subject(s): History, Identity (Psychology), Modern Philosophy, Philosophers, Philosophy and science, Philosophy, Modern, Psychology

Science exists to explain natural phenomena.

Metaphysics

computer science eg :c=computer sc=science so fully computer science

Computer Science is to mechanics as Computer Application is to drivers education.