An atomic winter is another term for a nuclear winter, a predicted drop in global temperature following a nuclear war due to dust in the upper atmosphere.
1 answer
Nuclear Winter - The Lonely Forest album - was created on 2007-08-04.
1 answer
No. A nuclear winter (by its name) is a cold period brought on by dust and debris in the atmosphere blocking out the sun after a nuclear explosion. This lack of sun would cause the earth to cool dramatically depending on the size of the blast. If a nuclear winter occurred we would be heading into another ice age rather than away from it.
1 answer
the after effects will be a nuclear winter. the coldest winter ever.
and if the cold doesn't kill and the nuclear waste doesn't, the soon to follow wars will.
http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_warfare has more info including dates, and what might will happen.
1 answer
The cast of Nuclear Winter - 2013 includes: Emma Maatman as Emma Anthony Tetrow as Crazy Tony Nick Townsend as Knife Nicholas Vance as Nick
1 answer
A nuclear war, which would result in a nuclear winter and the end of most if not all of life on Earth.
1 answer
Start by assuming some 'facts' that would start a nuclear winter. How many bombs must be dropped to actually start a nuclear winter situation? For each bomb, how much dust is kicked up into the atmosphere? Of that, how much will stay in the upper atmosphere? How much sunlight will then be reflected, causing the cooling effect? Make all these estimations. Keep going from there.
1 answer
Akin to global warming, just theories.
1 answer
Winter. Dust and debris will block the sun.
1 answer
1 answer
In the 1970s studies were being done on supercomputers of the effects of giant meteor impacts on the earth. It was notices that large firestorm forest fires would be ignited, as well as large amounts of dirt and powdered rock would be thrown out. The particulates (soot from forest fires and particulates from the impact) would end up in the stratosphere, where they could stay for decades. They would nearly block sunlight, causing a several decade worldwide winter.
Somewhat later it was noted that the available nuclear weapons had a similar total yield to the meteor impact. Therefor in a large nuclear war a decades long winter was also possible. This go the name nuclear winter.
1 answer
Nuclear Winter is a term that describes the after effects of a nuclear war. It is similar to a supervolcanic eruption in that the bomb will eject huge amounts of ash into the earth's stratosphere(were there clouds are and the planes fly) which would absorb the sunlight and get heated up, lifting it higher where it would persist for years. As sunlight would not be able to penetrate through, tempreatures on the surface would drop drastically.
1 answer
J. J. Gertler has written:
'Emerging technologies in the strategic arena' -- subject(s): Weapons systems
'Some policy implications of nuclear winter' -- subject(s): Nuclear disarmament, Nuclear warfare
1 answer
Everything dies. It is called a nuclear winter when there is so much debris in the atmosphere it blocks the sun. It is speculated that if several nuclear weapons are used the earth would go into a nuclear winter for several years because of the debris in the atmosphere. So, if people survive the blast, radiation sickness, and other conditions they will also have to deal with an age of no sun and live in permanent winter.
2 answers
All of the dwarves are currently hiding in Linda Hornsby's goody bag awaiting the nuclear winter.
1 answer
Nuclear weapons themselves do not directly contribute to global warming. However, nuclear explosions can release massive amounts of dust and soot into the atmosphere, leading to a temporary cooling effect known as nuclear winter. This can impact climate patterns and potentially contribute to global cooling.
2 answers
that would be for nuclear power. nuclear power is for warming things like pools in the middle of winter in Iceland. it really works. its also a good weapon if used properly
1 answer
It is difficult to provide an exact number as the use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic global consequences, potentially leading to nuclear winter and widespread devastation. It is imperative to prevent the use of such weapons to protect life on Earth.
1 answer
Probabaly Iran launching a nuclear warhead at us because of the "you-should-be-more-like-us" harassment, the missile supplied by their friend, Russia, leading to nuclear war followed by nuclear winter, and the human race dies out.(hope the nuke is their most powerful non-nuclear weapon in their arsenal instead.)
1 answer
1 answer
It is estimated that Russia has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the Earth multiple times over. A nuclear war involving Russia's full arsenal could lead to catastrophic global consequences, including nuclear winter and widespread destruction.
2 answers
you have to dodge every thing he shoots at you and keep hitting him with your repulsors before he gives out to much nuclear gas or else you will have to start the whole game over.
1 answer
Countries with nuclear weapons include the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea. Nuclear reactions themselves do not directly contribute to global warming. However, the production and mining of nuclear materials, as well as the operation and maintenance of nuclear facilities, can have environmental impacts that contribute to climate change.
2 answers
Because of all the nuclear bombs on standby and of all the deaths and mainly it was fought in the winter in russia
1 answer
It would likely take multiple Tsar Bomba size nuclear explosions to cause a nuclear winter, as the exact number would depend on a variety of factors including the amount of debris released into the atmosphere, distribution patterns, and climatic conditions. The concept of a nuclear winter involves a prolonged period of global cooling due to the blocking of sunlight by particles in the atmosphere, which can disrupt ecosystems and food supplies.
2 answers
No, current nuclear weapons do not have the capability to destroy the entire planet. However, they can cause catastrophic damage over a large area, leading to severe environmental consequences and loss of life. The concept of a "nuclear winter" resulting from massive nuclear exchanges could have global impacts on climate and ecosystems.
2 answers
A lack of light from the sun would cause an immediate cooling effect. For example, a nuclear winter occurs when the cloud of debris blocks the sun.
1 answer
A nuclear eclipse is not a recognized astronomical event. It may be a misuse or misunderstanding of terms, as "nuclear" typically refers to atomic or nuclear energy, while an eclipse is when one celestial body is obscured by another.
2 answers
depends on where it is detonated from ground zero to 5miles you would be killed instantly from 10 miles proberly get 3rd degree burns and radiation poisioning after 15 miles mostly fires, windows broken and nuclear winter and radiation sickness without medical care
1 answer
We use nuclear fission in nuclear reactors to tap nuclear energy.
1 answer
Nuclear is any activity related to the nuclei of atoms as nuclear energy, nuclear fission, nuclear engineering, nuclear physics, etc.
1 answer
Nuclear winter, the next ice age. If it does happen the world will most likely go on with a small population and repopulate. It will be like fallout but ice
1 answer
The synonym for nuclear fissure is nuclear division or nuclear cleavage.
2 answers
"Nuclear Winter" was a scary fiction created by Carl Sagan in an attempt to lobby the United States into unilateral nuclear disarmament and surrender.
In theory, a sufficient number of nuclear weapons detonated on the surface of the Earth would send soot and dust high into the atmosphere, where it would reflect sunlight back into space, causing the Earth to cool and enter a new ice age. (At the time, Sagan was convinced that Global Cooling and an incipient ice age was coming anyway.)
Sagan tried to portray the 1991 burning of the Kuwaiti oil wells as a continent-wide version of this, but it didn't happen; even though the oil wells burned much as Sagan had feared, India and China did not experience severe cooling.
1 answer
Examples of nuclear energy include nuclear power plants, nuclear weapons, and nuclear medicine for treating diseases such as cancer.
2 answers
Nuclear is a exothermic nuclear processes. This is also known as nuclear energy or power.
1 answer
Atmospheric phenomena such as high winds, lightning, and heavy precipitation can affect the operation and delivery of nuclear weapons by potentially interfering with communication, accuracy, and stability of the weapon. Adverse weather conditions can impact the targeting and detonation process of nuclear weapons, affecting their overall effectiveness and reliability. It is crucial for military forces to consider and account for atmospheric conditions when planning the deployment and use of nuclear weapons.
2 answers
a nuclear bomb releases significantly more energy due to nuclear fission or fusion reactions, resulting in a much larger explosion and greater devastation. Additionally, a nuclear bomb can also produce long-lasting radiation that can spread for miles, causing harmful health effects to people and the environment. Finally, the technology to build and deliver a nuclear bomb is highly sophisticated and its use could potentially lead to wider political and international consequences.
2 answers
Nuclear power is produced through two processes: Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion.
1 answer
is nuclear deal useful for us? why nuclear deal is useful for us? is nuclear deal useful for us? why nuclear deal is useful for us? is nuclear deal useful for us? why nuclear deal is useful for us? is nuclear deal useful for us? why nuclear deal is useful for us?
1 answer
Yes, nuclear energy is the electricity generated by nuclear power plants through nuclear reactions. Nuclear fuel, on the other hand, is the material such as uranium or plutonium that undergoes fission to produce the energy in nuclear power plants.
2 answers
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
1 answer