0
if a is bad, then negative bad or not bad is good.
-a means the opposite of a. Since a is negative and the opposite of a negative is positive, -a is positive.
1 answer
negative one. ■
-1
Proof
A / 2 = 0.5 * A
since A in this case is -2,
-2 * 0.5 = -1
1 answer
The smallest positive prime is 2, but there is no smallest negative prime.
One way to show this is to demonstrate that the cardinality of the set of negative primes is countably infinite (the proof will be similar to that for positive primes. Hint: use proof by contradiction. Assume a finite set of negative primes and derive a contradiction).
Let me know if you'd like me to write up a formal proof that there is no smallest negative prime. I'll be happy to dig it out of one of my old homework sets! :)
1 answer
a negative number plus a negative number is negative. here is a proof.
(-x)+(-x)
(-1)x+(-1)x
-1(x+x)
-1(2x)
-2x
a negative number times a negative number is positive though.
1 answer
-15 and 4
Proof;
-15 x 4 = -60
-15 + 4 = -11
1 answer
There is no definitive evidence or proof that demonstrates atheism is wrong. Atheism is a lack of belief in a god or gods, and it is not possible to prove a negative claim. The burden of proof typically lies with those making a positive claim, such as the existence of a god.
1 answer
Spread the word about its positive healing effects and lack of negative effects. Look online and all the proof you need will be there.
1 answer
The proof of the anticommutator relationship for gamma matrices shows that when you multiply two gamma matrices and switch their order, the result is the negative of the original product. This relationship is important in quantum field theory and helps describe the behavior of particles.
1 answer
It is generally impossible to prove a negative. The question needs to ask about evidence that Germany caused World War 1.
1 answer
No, but there are many fallacies.
These usually entail equating the positive and negative square root of some number, or involve division by zero.
1 answer
An indirect proof is a proof by contradiction.
1 answer
You cannot prove a negative. In order to prove that something is NOT real you first have to try to prove that it is real and fail. This has been known since the time of Aristotle. So the only proof that you can have of something not being real is a lack of proof of its existence. Not a convincing argument.
1 answer
This is NOT a proof, just an explanation.
Imagine you are on a number line and you are walking. Multiplying x*y is taking x steps, each of size y. Negative steps are interpreted by requriring you to face the negative end of the line before you start walking and negative step sizes are backward where backward is heel first. This mean to find, -x*-y you stand on zero, face in the negative direction, and then take x backward steps, each of size y.
1 answer
They can. They don't have to if you have proof of a negative test on meps records. Not every basic is the same. Drug tests cost money but they already have the people to give them.
1 answer
You can't. Unless you can prove they are wrong. Then you need to get the documented proof and submit it to each of the three major credit bureaus - Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion.
1 answer
Charles Darwin has done many neGative impacts. He has done made man question the Glories God. This enouGh should proof that Charles Darwin has done bad thinGs.
BTW I capitalize G because of the Glory of God. :)))))))1 answer
I have found no information as to proof that drug to have a negative effect on your baby.
I did however find "proof" as in indication that is does not have negative effect.
The dosage regimen of ornidazole requires no adjustment during pregnancy. Trough concentrations of ornidazole measured at 24 h post dose were above the MIC of sensitive organisms. Children born to the trial patients showed normal initial development and their growth was normal.
1 answer
The bankruptcy will remain on the credit report until the required ten years has expired.
UPDATE: Actually, you can force Equifax, Experian and TransUnion to remove a Bankruptcy from your credit report and you can do it legally using a federal law that is in place. Credit Bureaus MUST have "verifiable proof" of the "bankruptcy" in their files if they are going to report the negative item on your report. The dirty little secret the credit bureaus don't want you to know is that they do not have any "verifiable proof" in their files for any of the negative items on your credit report. The Federal Court that the bankruptcy was filed in may have this information on file but the credit bureaus don't. If you request the credit bureau to provide you with the "verifiable proof" that they have in their files they will remove the negative from your file.
1 answer
It is generally impossible to prove a negative, so it's up to the people who think Hitler was Jewish to provide evidence. However, see the related question.
1 answer
Americans had to show proof of a negative COVID-19 test and complete a health questionnaire in order to be allowed to come to Mexico.
1 answer
A proof written in the form of a paragraph (as opposed to a two-column proof)
1 answer
Both the algebraic proof and geometric proof are strong. The algebraic proof however is usually very involving.
1 answer
Bacardi 151 is a hundred and one proof! And its rum.
4 answers
The standard bullet proof vest is not stab proof, however there are some bullet proof vests that are. These stab-proof vests have a wire mesh on the outside, or a similar material.
1 answer
I am not really sure what you are asking but there are 3 types of proofs in geometry a flow proof, a 2-collumn proof, and a paragraph proof.
1 answer
Other than childish rumors floating around, there is no proof that Rihanna nor Kanye West worship any negative entities.
1 answer
“jealousy” may be a positive or a negative quality or emotion.
as far as love, no relationship can thrive without it. It stands to reason, therefore, that love is essential to happiness.
1 answer
100% pure alcohol is 200 proof. So 100 proof is 50% alcohol.
3 answers
It has a value from $5 in the lowest proof grade [Proof 60] to $375 in the highest proof grade [Proof 70]
1 answer
No. If you mixed them in equal proportions, you'd get 55 proof.
1 answer
The highest burden of proof is "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt."
1 answer
That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.
Consider this sequence:
103 = 1000
102 = 100
101 = 10
100 = 1
10-1 = 1/10
10-2 = 1/100
Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.
That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.
Consider this sequence:
103 = 1000
102 = 100
101 = 10
100 = 1
10-1 = 1/10
10-2 = 1/100
Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.
That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.
Consider this sequence:
103 = 1000
102 = 100
101 = 10
100 = 1
10-1 = 1/10
10-2 = 1/100
Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.
That is the way it is defined; in theory, it could be defined any other way. But the definition commonly used makes several rules maintain their validity, for example, the law about adding exponents - even when the exponent is negative.
Consider this sequence:
103 = 1000
102 = 100
101 = 10
100 = 1
10-1 = 1/10
10-2 = 1/100
Every time the exponent is reduced by one, the result gets reduced by a factor of 10. So, it seems logical to continue this pattern for a zero or negative exponent. Mind you, this is no proof - after all, the negative exponents is a matter of definitions, not of proof. The above only merely shows that the definition is reasonable.
2 answers
Yes there is and it can be proven scientifically.
1st Proof - Phenomena of Consciousness
2nd Proof - Phenomena of Memory
3rd Proof - Phenomena of Sleep
4th Proof - Phenomena of Dreams
5th Proof - Phenomena of Death
6th Proof - Phenomena of Psychical Research
7th Proof - Phenomena of Traveling Clairvoyance
8th Proof - Phenomena of Hypnotism
1 answer
A page proof is a trial page or proof which has been made up into pages.
1 answer
Foreclosures can be removed from your credit report like any other negative item. You must dispute it to the credit bureaus. The credit bureaus will have 30 days to verify the foreclosure or it must be removed from your credit report. With the higher amount of foreclosures lately you have a better chance of it being removed.
UPDATE: Actually, you can force Equifax, Experian and TransUnion to remove a Foreclosure from your credit report and you can do it legally using a federal law that is in place. Credit Bureaus MUST have "verifiable proof" of the "foreclosure account" in their files if they are going to report the negative item on your report. The dirty little secret the credit bureaus don't want you to know is that they do not have any "verifiable proof" in their files for any of the negative items on your credit report. The bank that held your mortgage may have this information on file but the credit bureaus don't. If you request the credit bureau to provide you with the "verifiable proof" that they have in their files they will remove the negative from your file.
1 answer
