symbolic logic
n.
A treatment of formal logic in which a system of symbols is used to represent quantities and relationships. Also called mathematical logic.
|
Results for symbolic logic
|
On this page:
|
A treatment of formal logic in which a system of symbols is used to represent quantities and relationships. Also called mathematical logic.
General term, not currently much used, for the study of formal logic. Generally, the study of logical form requires using particular schematic letters and variables (‘symbols’) to stand where terms of a particular category might occur in sentences.
Truth-functional Analysis
The first part of symbolic logic is known as truth-functional analysis, the propositional calculus, or the sentential calculus; it deals with statements that can be assigned truth values (true or false). Combinations of these statements are called truth functions, and their truth values can be determined from the truth values of their components.
The basic connectives in truth-functional analysis are usually negation, conjunction, and alternation. The negation of a statement is false if the original statement is true and true if the original statement is false; negation corresponds to “it is not the case that,” or simply “not” in ordinary language. The conjunction of two statements is true only if both are true; it is false in all other instances. Conjunction corresponds to “and” in ordinary language. The alternation, or disjunction, of two statements is false only if both are false and is true in all other instances; alternation corresponds to the nonexclusive sense of “or” in ordinary language (Lat. vel), as opposed to the exclusive “either...or...but not both” (Lat. aut).
Other connectives commonly used in truth-functional analysis are the conditional and the biconditional. The conditional, or implication, corresponds to “if...then” or “implies” in ordinary language, but only in a weak sense. The conditional is false only if the antecedent is true and the consequent is false; it is true in all other instances. This kind of implication, in which the connection between the antecedent and the consequent is merely formal, is known as material implication. The biconditional, or double implication, is the equivalence relation and is true only if the two statements have the same truth value, either true or false. In any truth function one may substitute an equivalent expression for all or any part of the function. The validity of arguments may be analyzed by assigning all possible combinations of truth values to the component statements; such an array of truth values is called a truth table.
The Predicate Calculus
There are many valid argument forms, however, that cannot be analyzed by truth-functional methods, e.g., the classic syllogism: “All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore Socrates is mortal.” The syllogism and many other more complicated arguments are the subject of the predicate calculus, or quantification theory, which is based on the calculus of classes. The predicate calculus of monadic (one-variable) predicates, also called uniform quantification theory, has been shown to be complete and has a decision procedure, analogous to truth tables for truth-functional analysis, whereby the validity or invalidity of any statement can be determined. The general predicate calculus, or quantification theory, was also shown to be complete by Kurt Gödel, but Alonso Church subsequently proved (1936) that it has no possible decision procedure.
Analysis of the Foundations of Mathematics
Symbolic logic has been extended to a description and analysis of the foundations of mathematics, particularly number theory. Gödel also made (1931) the surprising discovery that number theory cannot be complete, i.e., that no matter what axioms are chosen as a basis for number theory, there will always be some true statements that cannot be deducted from them, although they can be proved within the larger context of symbolic logic. Since many branches of mathematics are ultimately based on number theory, this result has been interpreted by some as affirming that mathematics is an open, creative discipline whose possibilities cannot be delineated. The work of Gödel, Church, and others has led to the development of proof theory, or metamathematics, which deals with the nature of mathematics itself.
Bibliography
See D. Hilbert and W. Ackermann, Principles of Mathematical Logic (tr. of 2d ed. 1950); W. V. Quine, Mathematical Logic (1968) and Methods of Logic (3d ed. 1972).
Mathematical logic is a branch of mathematics, which grew out of symbolic logic. Subfields include model theory, proof theory, set theory, and recursion theory. Research in mathematical logic has contributed to, and been motivated by, the study of foundations of mathematics, but mathematical logic also contains areas of pure mathematics not directly related to foundational questions.
Mathematical logic is closely related to the much older study of formal logic in philosophy, which began with Aristotle. It provides an easier and more complete method of checking the validity of arguments than the classical Aristotlian forms. Mathematical logic is also closely related to metamathematics.
One unifying theme in mathematical logic is the study of the expressive power of formal logics and formal proof systems. This power is measured by what mathematical concepts can be defined and what theorems can be proven within these formal systems.
Mario Bunge, Frothingham Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at McGill University has also claimed that mathematical logic is what Leibniz called characteristica universalis. [citation needed]
Mathematical logic was the name given by Giuseppe Peano to what was later called symbolic logic. In its classical version, the basic aspects resemble the logic of Aristotle, but written using symbolic notation rather than natural language. Attempts to treat the operations of formal logic in a symbolic or algebraic way were made by some of the more philosophical mathematicians, such as Leibniz and Lambert; but their labors remained little known and isolated. It was George Boole and then Augustus De Morgan, in the middle of the nineteenth century, who presented a systematic mathematical way of studying logic. The traditional, Aristotelian doctrine of logic was reformed and completed; and out of this development came an adequate instrument for investigating the fundamental concepts of mathematics. It would be misleading to say that the foundational controversies that were alive in the period 1900–1925 have all been settled; but philosophy of mathematics was greatly clarified by the "new" logic.
While the Greek development of logic put heavy emphasis on forms of arguments, the attitude of current mathematical logic might be summed up as the combinatorial study of content. This covers both the syntactic and the semantic, that is, both the forms of expressions and the meanings of those expressions. In computer science, purely syntactic considerations allow a string from some formal language to be transformed by a compiler program into a sequence of machine instructions. Semantic considerations allow a computer programmer to choose which strings to use to accomplish a particular purpose.
Some landmark publications in mathematical logic include the Begriffsschrift by Gottlob Frege, Studies in Logic by Charles Peirce, Principia Mathematica by Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead, and On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems by Kurt Gödel.
At its core, mathematical logic deals with mathematical concepts expressed using formal logical systems. The system of first-order logic is the most widely studied because of its applicability to foundations of mathematics and because of its desirable properties. Stronger classical logics such as second-order logic or infinitary logic are also studied, along with nonclassical logics such as intuitionistic logic.
The "Handbook of Mathematical Logic" (1977) divides mathematical logic into four parts:
The border lines between these fields, and also between mathematical logic and other fields of mathematics, are not always sharp; for example, Gödel's incompleteness theorem marks not only a milestone in recursion theory and proof theory, but has also led to Loeb's theorem, which is important in modal logic. The mathematical field of category theory uses many formal axiomatic methods resembling those used in mathematical logic, but category theory is not ordinarily considered a subfield of mathematical logic.
There are many connections between mathematical logic and computer science. Early pioneers in computer science, such as Alan Turing, were also mathematicians and logicians.
The study of computability theory in computer science is closely related to the study of computability in mathematical logic. There is a difference of emphasis, however. Computer scientists often focus on concrete programming languages and feasible computability, while researchers in mathematical logic often focus on computability as a theoretical concept and on noncomputability.
The study of programming language semantics is related to model theory, as is program verification (in particular, model checking). The Curry-Howard isomorphism between proofs and programs relates to proof theory; intuitionistic logic and linear logic are significant here. Calculi such as the lambda calculus and combinatory logic are nowadays studied mainly as idealized programming languages.
Computer science also contributes to mathematics by developing techniques for the automatic checking or even finding of proofs, such as automated theorem proving and logic programming.
Boolean algebra is used to design the hardware digital logic that determines what actions a computer will perform when it receives any particular combination of instructions from the program.
shree guru m mallapur
| Major fields of mathematics |
|---|
|
Logic · Set theory · Algebra (Abstract algebra – Linear algebra) · Discrete mathematics · Number theory · Analysis · Geometry · Topology · Applied mathematics · Probability · Statistics · Mathematical physics |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Some good "symbolic logic" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "symbolic logic" at WikiAnswers.
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Mathematical logic". Read more |
Mentioned In: