0
The rebellion of lower Canada ended when upper & lower cananda became one due to the government wanting one country not two halves.
1 answer
Canada, upper and lower after frustrations with political reform.
1 answer
They were against each other
1 answer
the rebellions happened because of the rebellions in lower Canada and they wanted a change in their government as well
1 answer
timber trade, transportation Also it had to do with the government Edit********* The rebellion in Lower Canada happened because the merchants and people with money, who owned land were the only ones aloud to vote, while the farmers and lower class people with no land were not aloud.ys i agree but how did it involve transportation......
6 answers
What were the long-term results of the war?
1 answer
A bad year for crops led to a recession, and in the following years, the banks had begun to tighten credit and recall loans, so when Mackenzie heard of the lower Canada rebellion he decided to start his own rebellion.
1 answer
A bad year for crops led to a recession, and in the following years, the banks had begun to tighten credit and recall loans, so when Mackenzie heard of the lower Canada rebellion he decided to start his own rebellion.
1 answer
The rebellion in Lower Canada failed because the command structure was flawed with no individual to command the troops. The communication was very bad between the troops. Armour couldn't get off the beach, and the point of attack was chosen incorrectly.
1 answer
The Upper Canada Rebellion of 1837 was led by William Lyon Mackenzie and aimed to establish responsible government and end the oligarchic rule. In Lower Canada, the rebellion of 1837 led by Louis-Joseph Papineau was fueled by grievances over political representation and land rights for French Canadians. Both rebellions sought greater autonomy from British colonial rule.
2 answers
Papineau started the rebellion, known as the Lower Canada Rebellion, because he believed in the need for political reform and greater democracy in Lower Canada (modern-day Quebec). He was frustrated with the British colonial government's refusal to address the grievances and demands of the French-speaking population. The rebellion was an attempt to bring about political change and assert the rights of the French Canadians.
2 answers
Louis Joseph Papineau led the rebellion in lower Canada but the fight in ST. Denis, St. Eustache and St. Charles were led by a Wilfred Nelson i think and Papineau was against fighting he wanted rebellion thro words so basically Louis Joseph Papineau led the rebellion and gathered people for the rebellion
1 answer
I don't know. This is the answer I was looking for, and that I've been looking for 1 hour now. Without the answer, I can't finish my history project, because we can't start unless we prove what we know.
======================================================================
Albert Einstein once said, "The formulation of a problem is often more essential than its solution." He is quoted as having said that if he had one hour to save the world he would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution. In other words, you have to figure out exactly what the problem is before you can begin to solve it.
Your question asks about a "rebellion of 1837 between upper and lower Canada" and whether it is still affecting us. There was no rebellion "between" Upper Canada and Lower Canada. There was a rebellion in Upper Canada. There was a much more serious rebellion in Lower Canada. They happened around the same period of time. But it was not Upper Canada versus Lower Canada.
You can search for an answer to your question until the cows come home, but you will not find one. You haven't asked the right question.
1 answer
William Lyon Mackenzie led the rebellions of 1837
It was more Papineau who led the rebellion in Lower Canada, however he fled the scene pretty early and allowed French-nationalism to take control and the "Patriotes" to take hold of the movement. MacKenzie was the Upper half of the movement but he was the only one that stuck around for the entire thing. :)
1 answer
William Lyon Mackenzie (not William Lyon Mackenzie King) led the rebellion of Upper Canada in 1837.
1 answer
Mackenzie found little support in the Upper Canada rebellion because most of the leaders had been arrested, which caused the rebellion to lose most of its momentum.
1 answer
Following the 1838 rebellion in Lower Canada, with her father missing and his brother arrested, Sophie and Luc must use ingenuity and courage to secure a bright future.
1 answer
yes he was the leader of the upper canada
1 answer
William Lyon Mackenzie was a radical because he wanted change using violence. When the troops left Toronto to settle the rebellions in lower Canada, Mackenzie made a rebellion with farmers to fight the government. his rebellion failed because he waited to long to attack.
1 answer
William Lyon Mackenzie made the Upper Canada rebellion in 1837
1 answer
No, not really, but she did smuggle slaves to Canada illegally.
1 answer
The Lower Canada rebellion was connected to two main themes: 1) the subordination of French Canada and its institutions to the ruling British regime; 2) the resurgence of French Canadian nationalism. French Canadians had secured control of the Lower Canada assembly, led by the emerging middle class, but encountered resistance to attempts to assert regional autonomy from the colonial British authorities. During the 1830s, economic recession and mass immigration caused severe suffering in Lower Canada and threatened their cultural majorities in Montreal and Quebec City. In response to these problems, the Patriotes, an organised French Canadian party, pushed for major reforms. They cut funding to local governments and civil service, preventing provision of public goods. The British government responded by asserting their control and pushing through the Russell Reforms, rejecting demands for autonomy by French Canada, and leading to the rebellion itself in 1837.
2 answers
It divided Canada in half, Upper and Lower Canada.
2 answers
It's not based on the location on a map. It is more geographical. The "lower Canada region" is more upriver on the St Lawrence. The higher up the river, the "lower" you are. Upper Canada or "Ontario" is located at the tip of the river. Settlers arrived through the St Lawrence and believed the entrance to the river was lower, and the end of the river was higher.
============================================================
"Upper Canada" and "Lower Canada" were named because of their relative elevations and their relative locations on the St Lawrence watershed. Upper Canada was upstream, and at a higher elevation; Lower Canada was downstream, and at a lower elevation.
4 answers
who ever wrote this is in my class and is righting the exam in a few days look in the text book and if you find it let me know.
1 answer
because France is only a DEVELOPING country so it has to be lower then Canada because Canada is a DEVELOPEDcountry
1 answer
The UK never invaded Canada. Canada is a principal part of the British Empire.
1 answer
The North-West Rebellion began in 1885 by the Metis people ofÊ District of Saskatchewan, Canada against the government of Canada because they believed their rights as indiginous poeple were not being protected.
1 answer
Before 1867, Canada was divided into upper and lower Canada. In lower Canada most of the people were French. In upper Canada most of the people were British. But on July first, 1867 upper and lower Canada joined confederation to become Canada, This is why we celebrate Canada day on July first :)
1 answer
Canada is north of the US lower 48 states.
2 answers
Canada East and Canada West were the former Lower Canada and Upper Canada respectively. Lower Canada and Upper Canada were united into the Province of Canada in 1841 by the British Parliament. The terms Canada East and Canada West were terms of description, not names of separate entities.
1 answer
The war of 1812 had ended and the Loyalists of Britain were returning and expecting better, however they found that they were getting very little out of there fighting for Britain for 2 years. they realized that their lives were not going to get better unless the acted. So that led to the Upper Canadian Rebellion led by Mackenzie. In the mean time, A rebellion was being led by Papineau in Lower Canada. the English and the French were having conflict, Canals were being built instead of roads preventing farmers from transporting their goods to the city, so their lives were not getting any better dispite their loyalty. So Papineau organized a rebellion.
What was preventing them from winning?
Papineau= No guns, No Real Military Training despite their efforts to replicate it
Mackenzie= Poorly Organized, Poor Leadership, No Training wat-so-ever, waited too long before attack, etc
Hope this helps! :)
6 answers
Around 300 civilians and military personnel were killed during the North-West Rebellion in Canada in 1885.
1 answer
upper and lower Canada were created to keep the different types on people in there own places
1 answer
The assembly proposed the union of Upper Canada and Lower Canada.
==================================================
The Constitution Act of 1791 divided Québec and created the colonies of Upper Canada and Lower Canada. It did not create political discontent. That did not occur until 1837.
2 answers
